It seems to me that whether or not the goal is worth achieving that Lars-Daniel has asked a reasonable question: how can we see the numeric values of the data that is sent to the printer driver? Well, one way would be to convert the image to the print profile and measure the value. I did this through a profile with 5 spot colors going from 0,160,0 to 0,250,0 (in AdobeRGB) and I was rather surprised to see that the converted colors were all fully saturated in the green, except for the 0,160,0 which became 38,249,0; all of the colors also had significant amounts of red in them and some blue - for example the 0,240,0 became 89,255,22. The same color (0,240,0) converted to the same paper but using a profile made by a different profiler (Argyll instead of i1Profiler) becomes 111,255,30. I don't really understand what is going on but if I did then I would certainly learn something. My initial interpretation is that the profiles are attempting to simulate the saturation of a green by adding red and blue ... which is completely crazy because red and blue certainly don't make green. On second view I see that the CMYK values are all a combination of cyan and yellow with no magenta ... so that will certainly give green. But of course the CMYK values I see in Photoshop are based on the CMYK profile selected ... further muddying the water (or ink). So I have to agree that getting the RGB values sent to the printer driver seems a rather futile exercise ... except that it might shed some light on what is actually going on ... and a careful choice of target might give some idea of whether one profile was doing a better job than another. For example, i1Profiler and Argyll give quite different values even though the rendering intent is the same for both: looking at a soft-proof on screen it's clear that Argyll is shifting the green towards yellow much more than i1Profiler ... and this can be seen in the CMYK values where yellow is significantly higher in Argyll than in i1Profiler (or if a different CMYK profile is chosen, cyan is lower in Argyll than in i1Profiler while yellow is held at 100%). Robert -----Original Message----- From: argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:argyllcms-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Ben Goren Sent: 26 October 2014 01:57 To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: [argyllcms] Re: output ICC gamut in RGB On Oct 25, 2014, at 6:26 PM, Lars-Daniel Weber <Lars-Daniel.Weber@xxxxxx> wrote: > Sure, but I want a numeric listing :) Might I suggest? This sure sounds like an intermediate step to some other goal, and I strongly suspect that it's not the ideal path to whatever that goal may be. If you fill in a bit more context, you may be pleasantly surprised.... b&