Pascal de Bruijn wrote: > > Well yes, but no software has support for such a construction, but that > would be really cool though. > > I still have one remaining issue, after inspecting some of my profiles, I > noticed the single shaper curve can be a bit bumpy. On most photo's I've > checked so far this does not seem to have a visual consequence. Yes, it's my feeling as well that the shapers of "-as" or "-aS" profiles tend to attempt to compensate the natural limitations of a matrix for data which simply can't be modelled exactly with a matrix-based model (for instance data from non-colorimetric color sensors, etc.). The bumps likely improve the fit to the training set, but they don't reflect the actual OECF and I would not be sure whether the generalization to data not in the training set is really improved by these bumps as well. > > However, is there a way to smooth the single shaper curve? In other words, not > to change the general shape, but only to remove smaller deviations... You could try "-ql", this will give you smoother shapers with fewer degrees of freedom. At least I suggest that you don't use -qu. Using a target with more patches may possibly improve the shapers as well. Regards, Gerhard