[argyllcms] Re: Image dependent ?
- From: Claas Bickeböller <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: argyllcms@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2018 08:12:04 +0100
BTW: The same is true for most „cheap“ filter-based display measurement
devices (like your i1Display) but this issue can be overcome with good
results by a built-in correction matrix which is ideally monitor-dependent.
The general experience with the i1 Display Pro is that it is much, much
better than it's
predecessors (i1d1, i1d2, even the DTP92/94),
I never compared it to the DTP94b but fully agree that it is much better than
the old i1 monitor sensors.
and quite competitive with some more
expensive rivals. Being a low cost device it is not perfect, but the use of
sensor
sensitivity calibration rather than direct matrix calibration gives it
practical
advantages over even expensive alternatives.
I do not know the details how they achieved the better performance.
I wanted to point out that such a „correction“ is easier for monitor sensors
than for scanners to be used for reflectance.
Cheers
Claas
Other related posts:
