Kristian Jörg wrote: > Video and film quality is very much about handling motion. SDTV is still > broadcasted as interlaced, > which CRT couild handle well in the old days. But with todays progressive > displays it is about > creating a progressive frame out of a number of interlaced frames. That is a > whole scientific area The problems I see with SDTV and even HDTV is simply ridiculously small bandwidth. They're packing 4 SDTV channels into one SATV channel, and the result is simply horrible. Blue ray and DVD seem somewhat better. > LCD and plasma are still developing and image quality has improved immensly > the last few years. > OLED may be the king if they can bring the costs down but the winner is not > yet crowned. Maybe, but lifetime could be an issue. CRT's may dim a bit, but they perform pretty well even after 20-30 years. > One reason for the problems are that the blue light oled ages much more > rapidly than the rest. LG > has solved that (they say) by using white OLED and color filters for RGB. > Simplified the technology > and removes the blue oled aging problem. We'll see in the coming reviews if > it holds up to a > critical test. Apparently white LED's also age in a way that changes their color markedly - they tend to go off the white locus and into the green. So I'm not sure what that says about a plan using white LED's to correct fading blue OLED's... Graeme Gill.