[aodvv2-discuss] Re: Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)

  • From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@xxxxxxxxx>
  • To: "aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2015 11:29:11 -0500

On Tue, Mar 3, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Lotte Steenbrink <
lotte.steenbrink@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

>
> TL;DR: I can live with having a pseudocode summary of AODVv2's operations
> in the appendix, but in my opinion, the parts describing how to build 5444
> internals will have to go in favor of more precise packet descriptions (if
> we still have the time).
>
>
Agree. I'd *completely* agree if we stop at "... the parts describing how
to build 5444 internals will have to go." I think it's a reasonable
compromise to leave the pseudocode summary *of AODVv2 operations*.

Regards,
Stan

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. aodvv2-discuss
  3. Archive
  4. 03-2015