[aodvv2-discuss] Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)
- From: Stan Ratliff <ratliffstan@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: "aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx" <aodvv2-discuss@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 2 Mar 2015 15:39:07 -0500
OK, gang -
Monday has pretty much come and gone, at least in the CET timezone. Since
we have a deadline for submission of the draft, I think we need to finally
settle on the issue of the amount of RFC 5444 discussion in Appendix A and
Appendix B.
To recap, we have (I believe) 3 opinions to remove the references, 1
opinion to keep them.
I'm ready to declare that consensus has been reached, and the 5444
tutorial/discussion/recommendation/however-we-classify-it goes bye-bye.
Differing opinions? Serve 'em up quick.
Regards,
Stan
Other related posts:
- » [aodvv2-discuss] Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444) - Stan Ratliff
- » [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)- Victoria Mercieca
- » [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)- Stan Ratliff
- » [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)- Charlie Perkins
- » [aodvv2-discuss] Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)- Victoria Mercieca
- » [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)- Charlie Perkins
- » [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)- Stan Ratliff
- » [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)- Lotte Steenbrink
- » [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)- Charlie Perkins
- » [aodvv2-discuss] Re: Appendices and RFC 5444 (was Writing for the future, was Appendices and RFC 5444)- Stan Ratliff