[antispam-f] Re: / in rules

  • From: Richard Porter <ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2006 17:28:40 GMT

On 12 Dec 2006 Frank de Bruijn wrote:

> In article <8ba802944e.ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>    Richard Porter <ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> How do you test for a slash (or //) in the operand of a rule? I can't
>> see anything about slashes in the manual under the syntax of rules.
>> When I try to test for a subject or sender containing // it doesn't
>> work.
> 
> For //, take a look at the StrongHelp page 'Comments in rules files'
> (Rules->Syntax->comments if you follow links from the first page).

Thanks. That's only in the 1.59-5 StrongHelp.

> I think it's probably worth mentioning this on the 'Known problems and
> restrictions' page...

You need to make in clear under "criterion" that it can't contain //, 
or better still, do without comments before rules or use || which is 
very unlikely to appear in a header, or make the separator " //" with 
a preceding space, or have an escape sequence for /, or have a 
preceding comment start with / at the start of the line. My preference 
is to have a comment after the rule, not in front of it.

Richard

-- 
 _
|_|. _   Richard Porter               http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_                                mailto:ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Other related posts: