[antispam-f] Re: Deferred message problem
- From: Richard Porter <ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 04 Mar 2009 10:52:09 GMT
On 4 Mar 2009 Jeremy Nicoll - freelists wrote:
>> < 1 UID149578-1168720018
>> < 2 UID149580-1168720018
> It's obvious that those two supposedly unique (different) UIDL values have
> the same trailing portion. I wonder if AS is only looking at the bit after
> the "-"?
> I assume that AS thinks both messages are the same message as the marked
> one.
> I wonder if the format of what is returned by the UIDL command varies a lot?
I can confirm that all the deferred messages had the same trailing
portion of the UID.
--
_
|_|. _ Richard Porter http://www.minijem.plus.com/
|\_||_ mailto:ricp@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Disclaimer: Please imagine about 50 lines of pointless clutter.
Other related posts:
