[antispam-f] Re: Deferred message problem
- From: Harriet Bazley <lists@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: antispam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sun, 05 Jul 2009 23:18:05 +0100
On 4 Jul 2009 as I do recall,
Frank de Bruijn wrote:
> On 10 Jun 2009 I wrote:
> > The interesting bit here is the rule number (1) and the fact the
> > message was deferred because of its length. Harriet reported
> > something similar in her message of 7 October (the first one to the
> > list after FreeLists borked my subscription). I'll investigate.
>
> Actually, it has nothing to do with either the rule number or the length
> test. It's a bug that shows up if the message contains an overly long
> header line which isn't folded properly so AntiSpam breaks it up into
> 253 byte pieces. If any of those pieces ends up starting with a colon,
> things go funny... 8-(
>
> I'll get a bug fix release out as soon as possible, but for those who
> can't wait, here's a quick fix for AntiSpam 1.61.1:
Thanks: I hit this one again the other day so I'm glad to know it's
identified! :-)
--
Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie ==
Cleanliness is next to impossible.
Other related posts:
