Jeff, you are right-it does depend on the copyright 'licensee' as to what they will do...but to chase down someone for making a one time shirt for a 'true fan' isn't going to happen-check out the lines of these 'hard core fan's in front of any convention-they are there to 'show off' their dedication and it helps the 'movie' or whatever....so they aren't going to sue someone that had 'one' shirt done for themselves. Saw a bunch of this on the news yesterday while down in Connecticut-there was an 'animay' (phonetic spelling-its that cartoon video game stuff the kids are into now) convention and there was the craziest outfits running around. One kid spitting image of 'edward scissorhands'-a character for sure copyrighted. There is a real 'gray' area-it is semantics for lawyers that have nothing but time on their hands to interpret to suit themselves. My lawyer is good in this field-that's how I still marketed the 'can wraps'.... but the big 'definition' is whether you are 'marketing' the copyrighted logo-or if you have been asked to produce an item for a direct end user-and not representing it, or your service, as 'that' product or company. You have to decide if you are 'marketing' a copyrighted image, or if the CUSTOMER is marketing it-or if it is for END USER only. Like I said, I'd do it in a minute-because I've been there, done that...and read the law and listened to my lawyer, and also have the definition of using copyright logos through the Ad Specialty Institute (ASI). Which, just by saying their name and spelling it out here-is USING A COPYRIGHTED LOGO...but in the context I used it, totally legal. But if I PUT that ASI lettering and/or logo on my website or letterheads-that violates the copyright because I am no longer a member. Gray area, but look what the ex president did with the explanation of a simple word.....lawyers are STILL having a field day with that one! And for those that don't believe that 'vultures' are on these sites just waiting to pick you off for something-BELIEVE IT! I have a legal notice from a big engraver mfg. in my files-ordering me to cease and desist from making derogatory remarks about their equipment ON LINE in a PUBLIC FORUM.... which my lawyer had no problem replying to THEM...about the FIRST AMENDMENT and also the fact that I had a half inch thick of THEIR paperwork documenting every complaint I had posted! Never heard from them again....but the 'magazine' that hosted the site was pressured into banning MY computer ID from posting on that site again.....again, violating my free speech. Took some talking to their editor to get him to see the light....his 'board' felt that the 'paid advertiser' had the right to dictate public discussion!