its unfortunate what happened to don but at the same time i have used the
tactic i stated as early as 2 months ago. things dont turn out the same for
everyone especially if one is more familiar with a tactic than someone
else. of course thats not talking down to anyone, just as an aerospace
engineer would have a way better idea than me how to build a plane. again i
use the bible as the law, which is not only recognized as actual american
law but its international law.
its "the living testament" a trust, as a christian you believe God is your
father, at common law you inherit the status of your father. thats also the
foundations of america law (we are all the sovereign that compose the
sovereign state that sits at the house of nations, not the usa which is the
political arm of the us for A). to boil it down more we have no business
talking to, dealing with, or going to court to talk to these people just as
they have no business talking to any of us unless theres a victim to a
crime [not statutes or codes]
Law of Nations, Book 2 Article 132: "God has created heaven for himself
and his saints, and has given the earth to mankind, intending it for the
advantage of the poor as well as of the rich. The roads are for their use,
and God has not subjected them to any taxes." (a license is a tax)
On Wed, Mar 3, 2021, 2:47 AM J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vfUJLHKKzjg&feature=emb_logo&ab_channel=PabloRamirez-Paulunslaved
got time to partially answer one of ur questions.. see video watch the
entire thing * Keep in mind he has the stuff u cant see on the paper but
also knows how to explain himself. and yes lucky the Superior knows what he
is talking about.. long story short they also must have Jurisdiction aka
STRAW MAN version aka the license. as a Man/Woman of flesh and blood
"TRAVELING" Not "Driving" your are under common law jurisdiction. Keep in
mind u can screw up with stuff you say to accidentally cross over to the
STRAW man jurisdiction. You don't want to lose personam jurisdiction over
you. keep in mind this doesn't mean even if you follow it all that they
will not somehow throw that out the window force you or threaten with
illegal arrest..yada yada. doesnt mean your wrong and then of course you
go though the court. I personally rather not deal with the black robe in
phyiscal person.. Mailing clerk is a lot easier and serve the cop via mail
also this way i can use my "right of avoidance" this can be used if done
right if not to court you go to appear "special appearance" aka keeping
out of their jurisdiction to "I am hereby Special Appearance, to challenge
jurisdiction only...."
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 10:58 PM Alla Miyets <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
As a woman of course, but then I have to represent my STRAWMAN that they
fine. Not giving them anything might result in broken windows. Is that
easier to get a ticket and then handle it from there or is there another
way to deal with a cop without giving him my name and/or NAME?
On Tuesday, March 2, 2021, 10:09:07 PM EST, J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
depends, are you acting as "A Fiction" when pulled over? or are you
acting as "Alla (Middle Name Only ) No last name. the natural woman of
flesh and blood
On Tue, Mar 2, 2021 at 8:49 PM Alla Miyets <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
noble,
How do you handle a traffic stop if you do not give a cop your name or
your driver's license?
On Tuesday, March 2, 2021, 07:18:05 AM EST, noble savage <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Glenn, U touched on something else that's VERY important - DON'T
ANSWER QUESTIONS OR EVEN TALK TO THE COPS! That includes providing a name
or any information that would assist them in filling out arrest data!*
* If U verbally state a "True-Christian, Name", they will write it
down as a "STRAWMAN NAME", & enter it into their system as such. The
officer can later testify in court that U verbally provided the "STRAWMAN
NAME" (hint: There's a reason it's called a "HEARING" - U're expected to
give a "SOUNDING"/FATHOM/UNDERSTANDING - see "idem sonans") If U must, even
make 'em book U as a "DOE" and find the info themselves, but NEVER verbally
utter a name to them. *
On Monday, March 1, 2021, 8:47:06 AM PST, Glenn Bever <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am agreeing with you....about the Miranda Warning, you know - I don't
understand those rights and I don't answer questions...
you taught me that..
Glenn Wayne © Living Soul All Rights Reserved
On Monday, March 1, 2021, 5:20:07 AM PST, noble savage <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
*I get w/t U're saying, & that is correct - Just the same, the Miranda
Warning was written specifically to suck people into the judicial system,
NOT to ensure your rights as a free wo/man...*
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 6:57:06 PM PST, Paul M <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When I said the Miranda Warning is wrong I refer to it saying You have a
right to an Attorney - where in the constitution is the word ATTORNEY or
LAWYER. That is a hoax and a Fraud on their part. You have a right to
'counsel' and that does not say anyone registered as a representative of
LAW, a counselor could be a Doctor, physical therapist, chef, etc you get
the picture - you are entitled to have someone who knows you or the
subject matter. I would ask for their copy of the LAW that are promoting,
if the LEO is making a judicial decision on the side of the road and a
notarized copy of his authority to do so.
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 7:50:03 AM CST, noble savage <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Miranda warning isn't "wrong" - It usually accomplishes EXACTLY w/t
it was meant to! 99.9% of "suspects" say they do "understand" the "rights
as read" to them - Those "rights" are actually legislative privileges in
purview of the 14th Amendment. It doesn't matter w/t they say or don't say
after that - THE HOOK IS SET!!*
* I do know of 1-time w/r 2 "suspects" simply said: "I do not understand
those rights", & then KEPT THEIR MOUTHS SHUT - Even as the deputy
repeatedly said: "What don't you understand?"... No arrests was made, & the
entire case fell apart (it was a felony marijuana cultivation &
distribution investigation - The cops didn't even seize the pot!)...*
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 5:12:06 AM PST, veritas ghost <
guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
what do you mean by "miranda warning is wrong"?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 2:37 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One should claim to be Sui Juris - over the age of 21 and responsible for
one's own actions.
BAR BRITISH ARISTOCRACY REGISTRATION - THEY PLEDGE an oath TO BE A
SERVANT TO THE CROWN, basically gave up their citizenship
Miranda Warning is wrong, Constitution does not does not say ATTORNEY it
says a counselor. An Attorney, Lawyer are not Licensed by the State, they
are members of a court, to do business . They are given a license by the
client to represent them
On Friday, February 26, 2021, 8:36:05 AM CST, Fred Wind <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It seems that the BAR is a private club with its members paying dues to
be in 'good standing'
Attorn, a transference of property
Attorney, facilitator of the transference of property
Hiring an Attorney, makes you a ward of the state, someone incapable of
handling your own affairs, CJS, Vol 7 section4
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 6:12 AM, clint kessler
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think you misinterpreted this... I believe it basically says these are
the only officials allowed to take someone else's Oath or sworn affidavit.
All attorneys are required to members of the BAR. I would expect lawyers
also.. What I did find interesting though and thanks for posting this...
Counselor at Law... last time I told a judge I was a helping friend or
counselor and the judge told me I could not do this..I asked why and he
said it was not allowed. I told him I have not taken any money or trade for
my services and he was a friend. No go... Hmm need to look into this a lil
closer. My comprehension is counselors in law are not required to be BAR.
Thanks again,
all rights reserved, all benefits waived,
Daryl-Arthur House of Kessler
On Friday, February 19, 2021, 6:57:11 PM CST, NELSON DICE <
nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
