yes the leos are privateers and not peace officers utilizing public goods
for private business in the forum of a religious ceremony of which "we the
people" have no business. they are attempting to force a contract on you
and theres many ways to void it not limited to them not properly forming
such contract. if they didnt read miranda which comes from a US supreme
court case, its 1 thing you can use agaisnt them if you chose. they are
also ignorant to the law but i dont profess to know their law or customs.
i dont know who came up with the madness common law is slave trade though,
seeing as the bible is the actual common law (gamble v us 2019 affirming
blackstone's commentaries on the laws of england- "the holy scriptures are
the actual law and when we refer to the holy scriptures that is the bible".
"when a law is unjust or bad law it is not law at all"). just as im not
sure who is promoting the madness of being a private civilian, when if you
think common law is bad and slave trade you should see whats being done
daily under military law.
On Sun, Feb 28, 2021, 3:01 PM cher_in_calgary <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
People keep using and renting/leaseing their deceased PERSON Chattel
slaves —- codes and statutes for the dead not the living
Common law is slave trading ....
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=a-v6T8pSZ7A&t=225s
Private Civilian
This private non commercial communication email is intended for the
recipient ONLY. A private conversation between living souls. If you are
not the intended recipient then please delete the email and notify US
immediately. If you do not delete it, then you accept all responsibility
for any potential injuries that could be caused in my unlimited capacity.
On Sunday, February 28, 2021, 12:42:02 p.m. MST, Paul M <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I do not believe most LEO's are trained in the Constitution or the LAW of
the Land which is Common Law. I think all they see is money to pay their
expenses.
On Sunday, February 28, 2021, 7:52:03 AM CST, veritas ghost <
guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
paul, thank you for clarifying. for everyone else, i think i should point
out 1 of the reasons i make daily news posts, i promote thinking on your
feet. miranda rights may not attain to a state citizen, as they have no
business talking to such people. at the same time if you know their
procedures, if they are in uniform etc, and can think on your feet, i can
tell you from first hand experience i have on multiple occasions used the
fact they didnt read me the miranda warning to make the whole situation
disappear.
if they dont read it to you, dont tell the "officer" and use it against
them and in more cases than not it will disappear without them even telling
you "your" no longer on the docket
On Sat, Feb 27, 2021, 9:36 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 8:56:03 PM CST, Paul M <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When I said the Miranda Warning is wrong I refer to it saying You have a
right to an Attorney - where in the constitution is the word ATTORNEY or
LAWYER. That is a hoax and a Fraud on their part. You have a right to
'counsel' and that does not say anyone registered as a representative of
LAW, a counselor could be a Doctor, physical therapist, chef, etc you get
the picture - you are entitled to have someone who knows you or the
subject matter. I would ask for their copy of the LAW that are promoting,
if the LEO is making a judicial decision on the side of the road and a
notarized copy of his authority to do so.
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 7:50:03 AM CST, noble savage <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
* Miranda warning isn't "wrong" - It usually accomplishes EXACTLY w/t
it was meant to! 99.9% of "suspects" say they do "understand" the "rights
as read" to them - Those "rights" are actually legislative privileges in
purview of the 14th Amendment. It doesn't matter w/t they say or don't say
after that - THE HOOK IS SET!!*
* I do know of 1-time w/r 2 "suspects" simply said: "I do not understand
those rights", & then KEPT THEIR MOUTHS SHUT - Even as the deputy
repeatedly said: "What don't you understand?"... No arrests was made, & the
entire case fell apart (it was a felony marijuana cultivation &
distribution investigation - The cops didn't even seize the pot!)...*
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 5:12:06 AM PST, veritas ghost <
guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
what do you mean by "miranda warning is wrong"?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 2:37 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One should claim to be Sui Juris - over the age of 21 and responsible for
one's own actions.
BAR BRITISH ARISTOCRACY REGISTRATION - THEY PLEDGE an oath TO BE A
SERVANT TO THE CROWN, basically gave up their citizenship
Miranda Warning is wrong, Constitution does not does not say ATTORNEY it
says a counselor. An Attorney, Lawyer are not Licensed by the State, they
are members of a court, to do business . They are given a license by the
client to represent them
On Friday, February 26, 2021, 8:36:05 AM CST, Fred Wind <
dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It seems that the BAR is a private club with its members paying dues to be
in 'good standing'
Attorn, a transference of property
Attorney, facilitator of the transference of property
Hiring an Attorney, makes you a ward of the state, someone incapable of
handling your own affairs, CJS, Vol 7 section4
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
<https://go.onelink.me/107872968?pid=InProduct&c=Global_Internal_YGrowth_AndroidEmailSig__AndroidUsers&af_wl=ym&af_sub1=Internal&af_sub2=Global_YGrowth&af_sub3=EmailSignature>
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 6:12 AM, clint kessler
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I think you misinterpreted this... I believe it basically says these are
the only officials allowed to take someone else's Oath or sworn affidavit.
All attorneys are required to members of the BAR. I would expect lawyers
also.. What I did find interesting though and thanks for posting this...
Counselor at Law... last time I told a judge I was a helping friend or
counselor and the judge told me I could not do this..I asked why and he
said it was not allowed. I told him I have not taken any money or trade for
my services and he was a friend. No go... Hmm need to look into this a lil
closer. My comprehension is counselors in law are not required to be BAR.
Thanks again,
all rights reserved, all benefits waived,
Daryl-Arthur House of Kessler
On Friday, February 19, 2021, 6:57:11 PM CST, NELSON DICE <
nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
