Glenn, U touched on something else that's VERY important - DON'T ANSWER
QUESTIONS OR EVEN TALK TO THE COPS! That includes providing a name or any
information that would assist them in filling out arrest data! If U verbally
state a "True-Christian, Name", they will write it down as a "STRAWMAN NAME", &
enter it into their system as such. The officer can later testify in court that
U verbally provided the "STRAWMAN NAME" (hint: There's a reason it's called a
"HEARING" - U're expected to give a "SOUNDING"/FATHOM/UNDERSTANDING - see "idem
sonans") If U must, even make 'em book U as a "DOE" and find the info
themselves, but NEVER verbally utter a name to them.
On Monday, March 1, 2021, 8:47:06 AM PST, Glenn Bever
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I am agreeing with you....about the Miranda Warning, you know - I don't
understand those rights and I don't answer questions...you taught me that..
Glenn Wayne © Living Soul All Rights Reserved
On Monday, March 1, 2021, 5:20:07 AM PST, noble savage
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I get w/t U're saying, & that is correct - Just the same, the Miranda Warning
was written specifically to suck people into the judicial system, NOT to ensure
your rights as a free wo/man...
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 6:57:06 PM PST, Paul M
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
When I said the Miranda Warning is wrong I refer to it saying You have a
right to an Attorney - where in the constitution is the word ATTORNEY or
LAWYER. That is a hoax and a Fraud on their part. You have a right to 'counsel'
and that does not say anyone registered as a representative of LAW, a counselor
could be a Doctor, physical therapist, chef, etc you get the picture - you are
entitled to have someone who knows you or the subject matter. I would ask for
their copy of the LAW that are promoting, if the LEO is making a judicial
decision on the side of the road and a notarized copy of his authority to do so.
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 7:50:03 AM CST, noble savage
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Miranda warning isn't "wrong" - It usually accomplishes EXACTLY w/t it was
meant to! 99.9% of "suspects" say they do "understand" the "rights as read" to
them - Those "rights" are actually legislative privileges in purview of the
14th Amendment. It doesn't matter w/t they say or don't say after that - THE
HOOK IS SET!!
I do know of 1-time w/r 2 "suspects" simply said: "I do not understand those
rights", & then KEPT THEIR MOUTHS SHUT - Even as the deputy repeatedly said:
"What don't you understand?"... No arrests was made, & the entire case fell
apart (it was a felony marijuana cultivation & distribution investigation - The
cops didn't even seize the pot!)...
On Saturday, February 27, 2021, 5:12:06 AM PST, veritas ghost
<guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
what do you mean by "miranda warning is wrong"?
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021, 2:37 PM Paul M <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
One should claim to be Sui Juris - over the age of 21 and responsible for
one's own actions.BAR BRITISH ARISTOCRACY REGISTRATION - THEY PLEDGE an oath
TO BE A SERVANT TO THE CROWN, basically gave up their citizenshipMiranda
Warning is wrong, Constitution does not does not say ATTORNEY it says a
counselor. An Attorney, Lawyer are not Licensed by the State, they are members
of a court, to do business . They are given a license by the client to
represent them
On Friday, February 26, 2021, 8:36:05 AM CST, Fred Wind
<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
It seems that the BAR is a private club with its members paying dues to be in
'good standing'
Attorn, a transference of propertyAttorney, facilitator of the transference of
propertyHiring an Attorney, makes you a ward of the state, someone incapable of
handling your own affairs, CJS, Vol 7 section4
Sent from Yahoo Mail on Android
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 6:12 AM, clint kessler<dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
I think you misinterpreted this... I believe it basically says these are the
only officials allowed to take someone else's Oath or sworn affidavit. All
attorneys are required to members of the BAR. I would expect lawyers also..
What I did find interesting though and thanks for posting this... Counselor at
Law... last time I told a judge I was a helping friend or counselor and the
judge told me I could not do this..I asked why and he said it was not allowed.
I told him I have not taken any money or trade for my services and he was a
friend. No go... Hmm need to look into this a lil closer. My comprehension is
counselors in law are not required to be BAR.Thanks again,all rights reserved,
all benefits waived,Daryl-Arthur House of Kessler
On Friday, February 19, 2021, 6:57:11 PM CST, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
