If one wants to limit the judge decisions. Judicial notice of a fact does that.
Judicial notice is some times accepted as everyone knows and others are
verbally put into the record as a fact. Using agreements of treaties, and
constitution binds the court to that statement. Then one can make a motion from
that fact that cannot be debated or changed.
On Mar 17, 2021, 5:50 AM -0600, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
theres law and legislative things may go off of when they choose, but in
reality thats not what the courts actual process is either. their courts are
to follow stare decisis and the rulings of the US supreme court, of which if
it errors no lower court may correct it. "judges" dont get to do whatever
they want or judge however they please even if they act as such, and fraud
can always be overturned or handled in 1 manner or the other
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 9:30 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dice and everyone
Here is my present approach in the court presently. We all know they use
presumptions and assumptions. We are to use facts. Unbeatable facts. Not
just a statement or a fact that may be debatable. Court cases is their
judges opinion at the time legislative laws existed. Ever changing
legislative changing laws.
Affadavits unrebutted are truth. That is only true if on the surface it
appears as truth. Make sure your affadavit is reasonable, logical and
appears true. That affadavit can be challenged at anytime by opposing
party.
Better then affadavits is what I call as contract or agreements in law.
Article 1, section 8, clause 17 is a fact. So motion the court to take
judicial notice of that article and stating your a national and not an
United States citizen. That is now fact in the court and can not be
challenged. It may be initially but has no standing unless you twisted
the interpretation. Judge/magistrate prosecutor (whatever as the name
means nothing) may
try to debate it. That is why little and browns edition of law and
treaties is important because it states anything in that book is not
debatable in all courts. So darn solid they made a code on it.
So one addresses every point with the constitution/agreement and
treaties. These are facts. That one needs to motion into the record by
judicial notice. Judicial notice is a fact established and not opened for
debate. Then one can motion from there. If they do not have jurisdicton
by the fact that the constitution agreement states otherwise. Motion to
vacate the case for lack of authority by judicial notice of Article 1,
section 8, clause 17. Denied? appeal and probably could file a judicial ?
on the judge. I'm not familiar with that process and someone else will
have to instruct.
One cannot mix jurisdictions.
On Mar 15, 2021, 6:56 PM -0600, victor swope <vmswope@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
You go after the man acting in capacity of the public servant, notice
of claim, trespass! Register mail him an affidavit he cant rebutt and
he's a witness against himself.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 10:38 AM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Thanks Charley, very clear explanation of how to delineate.
Q. Does Positive Law apply to U.S. citizens, citizens of the
United States, and also public officers and employees? IF so, how
would a man proceed agiasnt a pubic servant successfully, washout
access to a common law court?
Or can a man call open a common law court in a defact state?
From: Charley Dan
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:23 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Interesting
notations of USC Titles that are marked positive law
Positive law is still their law. A common law court has no written
law. Or is not common law. It is written on your heart unless your
conscience is seared and why it takes a jury then.
On Mar 15, 2021, 6:57 AM -0600, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>,
wrote:
quote_typehttps://photos.app.goo.gl/ry42QQbvpJ89D2hA8
The Title for Congress is NOT Positive Law....seems to fit ...
Get Outlook for Android
<>
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on
behalf of J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2021 8:00:21 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Interesting
notations of USC Titles that are marked positive law
the stars asterisks represent Positive law
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 7:54 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
