Tomorrow?
Take the citation and make a copy and staple this note to it. "The constitution
of the United States of America: Article 1, section 8, clause 17; I'm not an
United States Citizen. I'm a state national. Sign your name.Take to the court
and leave with clerk. If she gives you a signed copy your done. If not, go home
and mail another copy to the court. your done.
Do not go to court unless you want to battle. In that case I would motion for
time to prepare.
That statement is a jurisdiction claim and a fact that can be challenged at
anytime. Even after conviction. So if you end in jail. Same thing sent to the
circuit court as haebeaus corpus for lack of jurisdiction. Good luck..
On Mar 17, 2021, 9:03 PM -0600, Lane Withrow-Frisbee
<yallywoodatlmetro@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Darko g me into a kangazoom bench trial at 1230pm tomorrio w.. poidot fruit
as to another case jury trial 22. Without due process only seen judge once
it's appearance wasn't for yr half want me to wear mask can't. A yr . In
jail . . Any ideas!
On Wed, Mar 17, 2021, 5:04 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Judicial notice: is based on fact. I use agreements we the people have.
"I motion the court to take judicial notice of the Constitution of the
United States of America, article 1, section 8, clause 17.; that the
United States government has very limited jurisdicton to land purchased. "
On Mar 17, 2021, 10:19 AM -0600, Jb <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
Example of judicial notice please
On Mar 17, 2021, at 11:39 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
If one wants to limit the judge decisions. Judicial notice of a fact
does that. Judicial notice is some times accepted as everyone knows
and others are verbally put into the record as a fact. Using
agreements of treaties, and constitution binds the court to that
statement. Then one can make a motion from that fact that cannot be
debated or changed.
On Mar 17, 2021, 5:50 AM -0600, veritas ghost
<guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
theres law and legislative things may go off of when they choose,
but in reality thats not what the courts actual process is either.
their courts are to follow stare decisis and the rulings of the US
supreme court, of which if it errors no lower court may correct it.
"judges" dont get to do whatever they want or judge however they
please even if they act as such, and fraud can always be overturned
or handled in 1 manner or the other
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 9:30 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Dice and everyone
Here is my present approach in the court presently. We all know
they use presumptions and assumptions. We are to use facts.
Unbeatable facts. Not just a statement or a fact that may be
debatable. Court cases is their judges opinion at the time
legislative laws existed. Ever changing legislative changing
laws.
Affadavits unrebutted are truth. That is only true if on the
surface it appears as truth. Make sure your affadavit is
reasonable, logical and appears true. That affadavit can be
challenged at anytime by opposing party.
Better then affadavits is what I call as contract or agreements
in law. Article 1, section 8, clause 17 is a fact. So motion
the court to take judicial notice of that article and stating
your a national and not an United States citizen. That is now
fact in the court and can not be challenged. It may be
initially but has no standing unless you twisted the
interpretation. Judge/magistrate prosecutor (whatever as the
name means nothing) may
try to debate it. That is why little and browns edition of law
and treaties is important because it states anything in that
book is not debatable in all courts. So darn solid they made a
code on it.
So one addresses every point with the constitution/agreement
and treaties. These are facts. That one needs to motion into
the record by judicial notice. Judicial notice is a fact
established and not opened for debate. Then one can motion from
there. If they do not have jurisdicton by the fact that the
constitution agreement states otherwise. Motion to vacate the
case for lack of authority by judicial notice of Article 1,
section 8, clause 17. Denied? appeal and probably could file a
judicial ? on the judge. I'm not familiar with that process and
someone else will have to instruct.
One cannot mix jurisdictions.
On Mar 15, 2021, 6:56 PM -0600, victor swope
<vmswope@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
You go after the man acting in capacity of the public
servant, notice of claim, trespass! Register mail him an
affidavit he cant rebutt and he's a witness against himself.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 10:38 AM NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Charley, very clear explanation of how to
delineate.
Q. Does Positive Law apply to U.S. citizens, citizens of
the United States, and also public officers and
employees? IF so, how would a man proceed agiasnt a
pubic servant successfully, washout access to a common
law court?
Or can a man call open a common law court in a defact
state?
From: Charley Dan
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:23 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re:
Interesting notations of USC Titles that are marked
positive law
Positive law is still their law. A common law court has
no written law. Or is not common law. It is written on
your heart unless your conscience is seared and why it
takes a jury then.
On Mar 15, 2021, 6:57 AM -0600, NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>, wrote:
quote_typehttps://photos.app.goo.gl/ry42QQbvpJ89D2hA8
The Title for Congress is NOT Positive Law....seems to
fit ...
Get Outlook for Android
<>
From:
administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
on behalf of J_B <tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2021 8:00:21 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re:
Interesting notations of USC Titles that are marked
positive law
the stars asterisks represent Positive law
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 7:54 PM NELSON DICE
<nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote: