Wouldn't a Notice to take Judicial Cognisiance have more teeth?
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ;
Jb
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2021 11:18 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Interesting notations of USC
Titles that are marked positive law
Example of judicial notice please
On Mar 17, 2021, at 11:39 AM, Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If one wants to limit the judge decisions. Judicial notice of a fact does that.
Judicial notice is some times accepted as everyone knows and others are
verbally put into the record as a fact. Using agreements of treaties, and
constitution binds the court to that statement. Then one can make a motion from
that fact that cannot be debated or changed.
On Mar 17, 2021, 5:50 AM -0600, veritas ghost <guyettedamien8@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
theres law and legislative things may go off of when they choose, but in
reality thats not what the courts actual process is either. their courts are to
follow stare decisis and the rulings of the US supreme court, of which if it
errors no lower court may correct it. "judges" dont get to do whatever they
want or judge however they please even if they act as such, and fraud can
always be overturned or handled in 1 manner or the other
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 9:30 PM Charley Dan <charleydan@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Dice and everyone
Here is my present approach in the court presently. We all know they use
presumptions and assumptions. We are to use facts. Unbeatable facts. Not just a
statement or a fact that may be debatable. Court cases is their judges opinion
at the time legislative laws existed. Ever changing legislative changing laws.
Affadavits unrebutted are truth. That is only true if on the surface it appears
as truth. Make sure your affadavit is reasonable, logical and appears true.
That affadavit can be challenged at anytime by opposing party.
Better then affadavits is what I call as contract or agreements in law. Article
1, section 8, clause 17 is a fact. So motion the court to take judicial notice
of that article and stating your a national and not an United States citizen.
That is now fact in the court and can not be challenged. It may be initially
but has no standing unless you twisted the interpretation. Judge/magistrate
prosecutor (whatever as the name means nothing) may
try to debate it. That is why little and browns edition of law and treaties is
important because it states anything in that book is not debatable in all
courts. So darn solid they made a code on it.
So one addresses every point with the constitution/agreement and treaties.
These are facts. That one needs to motion into the record by judicial notice.
Judicial notice is a fact established and not opened for debate. Then one can
motion from there. If they do not have jurisdicton by the fact that the
constitution agreement states otherwise. Motion to vacate the case for lack of
authority by judicial notice of Article 1, section 8, clause 17. Denied? appeal
and probably could file a judicial ? on the judge. I'm not familiar with that
process and someone else will have to instruct.
One cannot mix jurisdictions.
On Mar 15, 2021, 6:56 PM -0600, victor swope <vmswope@xxxxxxxxx>, wrote:
You go after the man acting in capacity of the public servant, notice of claim,
trespass! Register mail him an affidavit he cant rebutt and he's a witness
against himself.
On Mon, Mar 15, 2021, 10:38 AM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
Thanks Charley, very clear explanation of how to delineate.
Q. Does Positive Law apply to U.S. citizens, citizens of the United States,
and also public officers and employees? IF so, how would a man proceed agiasnt
a pubic servant successfully, washout access to a common law court?
Or can a man call open a common law court in a defact state?
From: Charley Dan <mailto:charleydan@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Monday, March 15, 2021 10:23 AM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx;
administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Interesting notations of USC
Titles that are marked positive law
Positive law is still their law. A common law court has no written law. Or is
not common law. It is written on your heart unless your conscience is seared
and why it takes a jury then.
On Mar 15, 2021, 6:57 AM -0600, NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx>, wrote:
The Title for Congress is NOT Positive Law....seems to fit ...
Get Outlook for Android
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Faka.ms%2Fghei36&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd8ecdcfdb1d844cddf0f08d8e7bdd723%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637514149828651291%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=FJZtwyK36F9kRRWpDrlFEOSIlOl7%2BScLRKFHh7J%2BwhE%3D&reserved=0>
<>
From: administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on behalf of J_B
<tf4624@xxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Sunday, March 14, 2021 8:00:21 PM
To: administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
<administrating-your-public-servants@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [administrating-your-public-servants] Re: Interesting notations of USC
Titles that are marked positive law
the stars asterisks represent Positive law
On Sun, Mar 14, 2021 at 7:54 PM NELSON DICE <nelsondice@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/ry42QQbvpJ89D2hA8 ;
<https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fphotos.app.goo.gl%2Fry42QQbvpJ89D2hA8&data=04%7C01%7C%7Cd8ecdcfdb1d844cddf0f08d8e7bdd723%7C84df9e7fe9f640afb435aaaaaaaaaaaa%7C1%7C0%7C637514149828661289%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C1000&sdata=eCkpBASCI3f5C0OkKf1zSKwl6Q7cSLjEzfdQ%2Br1QRg0%3D&reserved=0>
--
This email has been checked for viruses by AVG.
https://www.avg.com
