[acc_tr_vsk] Re: R: Re: Incident Antonio John Rick

  • From: "JSTO" <jsto@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <acc_tr_vsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2010 12:25:17 +0200

Dear Friends,

In amending S.I rule 1.3, the ITBYC never intended to harm, or to
voluntarily put UNT away
ITBYC manages the entire race team, the way he finds most productive in the
organization of virtual competitions

This new rules is quite strange for me too, so it was good to show our
disagreement. It also showed our involvement !
Is it smart to resign from ITBYC, on the pretext that we are proud to be a
International club ?
I don't think so ...
The nobility letters of our Team racing in ACC are acquired. This means that
the ITBYC recognize us as a real team (in spite of inactive for instant :) )
but the racing team in ACC is not sufficiently shared in the world to fully
integrate it in a RC44 teams environment (or to create a new environment) 

I also think that we still need humility and resignation of this
organization seems obsolete, because ITBYC and us, could involuntary
marginalize this discipline even more - having chosen the ACC was already
sensible !

Only Humility could give us the expansion and the integration that we dream.
Be sure that our personalities are now recognize inside ITBYC.
Organize a big event is another way to democratize INERTIAL TEAM RACING in
ACC and sure Harald (Euphoria) will join 
Errors and omissions excepted, I simply wanted to share my point of view
with you all my friends.

Good Sunday
Jérôme (Adoonis)

-----Message d'origine-----
De : acc_tr_vsk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:acc_tr_vsk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] De la part de Piaggio, Marco
Envoyé : dimanche 6 juin 2010 10:36
À : acc_tr_vsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Objet : [acc_tr_vsk] R: Re: Incident Antonio John Rick

Thanx Theo for your messages!
This maybe could be a reason to stay in ITBYC...

Da: acc_tr_vsk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [acc_tr_vsk-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] per
conto di theo [theo@xxxxxxxxxxx]
Inviato: venerdì 4 giugno 2010 21.52
A: acc_tr_vsk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Oggetto: [acc_tr_vsk] Re: Incident Antonio John Rick

R 18 is on (again)  the moment boats are on the same tack, the right to
mark-room was decided when either of them entered the zone.
I thoink Anton passed head to wind too .... ?

Am 04.06.2010 17:10, schrieb jd-pmc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx:
> Dear THEO,
>> A boat cannot loose its right to mark room by taking more room then she
>> is entitled to, however if she takes more room then she is entitled to
>> she will no longer be exonerated from breaking a rule.
> OK. I agree.
> How do you handle the rule 18.2(c):
> 18.2 Giving Mark-Room
>  (c) When a boat is required to give mark-room by rule 18.2(b), she
> shall continue to do so even if later an overlap is broken or a
> new overlap begins. However, if either boat passes head to
> wind or if the boat entitled to mark-room leaves the zone, rule
> 18.2(b) ceases to apply.
> AIMO and ALB had passed their head to wind before ANTON hitted them.
> Have they loose their rights to mark-room defined by 18.2(b) ?
> Regards,
> Jluc

Other related posts: