[windows2000] Re: Backup Storage Media
- From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 08:57:20 +0200
Andy Wolstenholme <> wrote on Monday, May 22, 2006 1:57 AM:
No prob, glad to help. Backup is very important, and you'd better have a
working backup-solution, or you may find yourself lynched by a user-mob. 8-)
> thanks sorin,
>
> just needed some confirmation that they are not as feeble as DATS can be
>
>
>> From: "Sorin Srbu" <sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Reply-To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> To: <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: [windows2000] Re: Backup Storage Media
>> Date: Thu, 18 May 2006 08:32:38 +0200
>> Received: from turing.freelists.org ([206.53.239.180]) by
>> bay0-mc11-f14.bay0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.1830); Wed,
>> 17 May 2006 23:35:11 -0700
>> Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org
>> (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id 63C5C329F35;Thu, 18 May
>> 2006 02:33:08 -0400 (EDT)
>> Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost (turing
>> [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 28212-10; Thu, 18 May
>> 2006 02:33:08 -0400 (EDT)
>> Received: from turing (localhost [127.0.0.1])by turing.freelists.org
>> (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id E0845329F30;Thu, 18 May
>> 2006 02:33:07 -0400 (EDT)
>> Received: with ECARTIS (v1.0.0; list windows2000); Thu, 18 May 2006
>> 02:32:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])by
>> turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id
>> 1428F324E49for <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:32:47
>> -0400 (EDT) Received: from turing.freelists.org ([127.0.0.1])by localhost
>> (turing [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)with ESMTP id 28110-09 for
>> <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>;Thu, 18 May 2006 02:32:47 -0400 (EDT)
>> Received: from colibri.its.uu.se (colibri.its.UU.SE [130.238.4.154])by
>> turing.freelists.org (Avenir Technologies Mail Multiplex) with ESMTP id
>> 1288D3297F0for <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 May 2006 02:32:46 -0400
>> (EDT)
>> Received: by colibri.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 211)id CF427869; Thu,
>> 18 May 2006 08:32:42 +0200 (DFT)
>> Received: from colibri.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by colibri.its.uu.se via
>> virus-scan id s14361; Thu, 18 May 06 08:32:38 +0200
>> Received: from nyarlathotep (mach164.orgfarm.uu.se [130.238.38.65])by
>> colibri.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3665657Bfor
>> <windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>; Thu, 18 May 2006 08:32:38 +0200 (DFT)
>> X-Message-Info: LsUYwwHHNt0MBT6jaW+mjr6FOj8W9T1ZL6p2qXzsh0M=
>> X-Original-To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Delivered-To: windows2000@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Organization: Org Pharm Chem, Uppsala University of Sweden
>> X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11
>> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.3790.2663
>> Thread-Index: AcZ6Jpq8eOOTSYRXQPSUo6BCRR9D6gAHXfSw
>> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
>> X-archive-position: 16419 X-ecartis-version: Ecartis v1.0.0
>> Errors-to: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> X-original-sender: sorin.srbu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Precedence: normal
>> X-list: windows2000
>> X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new-20030616-p10 (Debian) at avenirtech.net
>> Return-Path: windows2000-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> X-OriginalArrivalTime: 18 May 2006 06:35:18.0694 (UTC)
>> FILETIME=[3AF27C60:01C67A45]
>>
>> Andy Wolstenholme <> wrote on Thursday, May 18, 2006 4:56 AM:
>>
>> We've used LTOs for several years now, with an HP storageworks 215e
>> tapedrive. No problem so far. I expected them to wear out faster, but so
>> far I haven't had to exchange any of them. The tapes are a bit on the
>> expensive side and we had to buy like a dozen of them or so in order to
>> keep a few generations and to be able to cycle them, though.
>>
>> I actually just finished rebuilding the backup server yesterday with
>> win2k3, after having run run win2k on it for many years. The stoneage
>> Tapeware app we used before, now seems to have given up with win2k3,
>> but the builtin windows Backup applet works just fine.
>>
>> We used 1/2GB DLTs before the current 100/200GB LTOs, but we grew out
>> of those. Data has a tendency to grow over time, and never decrease for
>> some darn reason... 8-}
>>
>>
>>> Hi chaps,
>>>
>>> Has anyone used an LTO tape drive in placement for DLT/SDLT drives.
>>>
>>> Implementing backup strategy and havent used LTO as yet. Are they as
>>> reliable as DLT/SDLT (from my experiences anyway) and easy to implement?
>>>
>>> Are there any other media and drive recomendations for this sort of basic
>>> 'overnight, offsite' backup implementation
>>>
>>> thanks in advance
>>
>>
>> *****************************
>> New Site from The Kenzig Group!
>> Windows Vista Links, list options
>> and info are available at:
>> http://www.VistaPop.com
>> *****************************
>> To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
>> mode or view archives use the below link.
>>
>> http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
>
>
> *****************************
> New Site from The Kenzig Group!
> Windows Vista Links, list options
> and info are available at:
> http://www.VistaPop.com
> *****************************
> To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
> mode or view archives use the below link.
>
> http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
*****************************
New Site from The Kenzig Group!
Windows Vista Links, list options
and info are available at:
http://www.VistaPop.com
*****************************
To Unsubscribe, set digest or vacation
mode or view archives use the below link.
http://thethin.net/win2000list.cfm
Other related posts:
