[visurfacereader] Re: Please pass this around, Logic Pro X accessibility overview draft 5.1

  • From: Bryan Smart <bryansmart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: visurfacereader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 21:02:09 -0400

A little deeper, but about the same in other dimensions.

Bryan



On Aug 30, 2014, at 4:22 PM, Victor Tsaran (Redacted sender "vtsaran@xxxxxxxxx" 
for DMARC) <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Hi Bryan.
> Would the MCU surface be much larger in size than BCF 2000? For me, it’s also 
> about how much I can fit on my desk. :)
> 
>>> 
>>> From: visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>>> [mailto:visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bryan Smart
>>> Sent: 20 August 2014 18:20
>>> To: visurfacereader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [visurfacereader] Re: Please pass this around, Logic Pro X 
>>> accessibility overview draft 5.1
>>>  
>>> Tim, can you describe the work-around in brief? I don’t need details or 
>>> hand-holding, but not sure what tweak is needed.
>>>  
>>> I’ve given up on Mackie Control compatible gear like the ProjectMix and 
>>> BCF2000, and now have a real Mackie Control Universal Pro. Also dumping my 
>>> BCR2000 for a Mackie C4. Of the other low-cost surfaces, only the 
>>> ProjectMix, and perhaps the FW1884, are close to the MCU’s construction 
>>> quality. Of course, the ProjectMix and FW1884 are old products with 
>>> horrible Mac support now, so not good options, anyway.
>>>  
>>> For others on the list that might be curious about the differences, the MCU 
>>> has more dedicated buttons for functions than any of the other units that I 
>>> listed. The MCU Pro is also significantly more compact than they are. 
>>> Finally, the jog wheel on the MCU Pro is beefier, has a bit of weighted 
>>> inertia to it, and has an all-around better feel to it than the ones that 
>>> I’ve used on the ProjectMix and FW1884. The other Mackie Control compatible 
>>> units always seem to cut some corner or another, even if a small one, and 
>>> it is nice to finally have the real deal.
>>> 
>>> Bryan
>>>  
>>>  
>>>  
>>> On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:21 PM, Tim Burgess <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Hi,
>>> 
>>> There's currently a problem when trying to use SurfaceReader with Logic. The
>>> Logic development team have a copy of the application and I'm waiting to
>>> hear some suggestions. There is a way around, but it's dependent on you
>>> having sighted help to set it up, so this is obviously unsatisfactory.
>>> 
>>> I'll post back on this as soon as I have something more constructive to add.
>>> 
>>> Best wishes.
>>> Tim Burgess
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> [mailto:visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ramy moustafa
>>> Sent: 19 August 2014 19:00
>>> To: visurfacereader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> Subject: [visurfacereader] Re: Please pass this around, Logic Pro X
>>> accessibility overview draft 5.1
>>> 
>>> What version i must use from logic?
>>> 
>>> Ramy moustafa saber
>>> Musicc instructor at:
>>> faculty of musical education
>>> music arranger and sound engineer
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On May 22, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Keith Reedy <keithreedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi folks,
>>> 
>>> This is now on line at,
>>> 
>>> http://icanworkthisthing.com/docs/mac_with_voiceover/audio/Logic%20With%20Vo
>>> iceover/LogicProXAccessibilityOverviewdraft5_1.shtml
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Just a change in drag and drop loops.
>>> 
>>> This is as far as I will take the overview.  I think if one reads the
>>> users guide they will get along fine.
>>> 
>>> We print the Bible in Braille,
>>> http://biblesfortheblind.org
>>> Keith Reedy
>>> God gives His best to those who leave the choice with Him.  J Hudson
>>> Taylor.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> We are Braille Bible printers,
>>> http://biblesfortheblind.org
>>> Keith Reedy
>>> keithreedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> 
>> 
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. visurfacereader
  3. Archive
  4. 08-2014