[visurfacereader] Re: Please pass this around, Logic Pro X accessibility overview draft 5.1

  • From: "Victor Tsaran" <dmarc-noreply@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> (Redacted sender "vtsaran@xxxxxxxxx" for DMARC)
  • To: visurfacereader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2014 13:22:04 -0700

Hi Bryan.
Would the MCU surface be much larger in size than BCF 2000? For me, it’s also 
about how much I can fit on my desk. :)

>> 
>> From: visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
>> [mailto:visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Bryan Smart
>> Sent: 20 August 2014 18:20
>> To: visurfacereader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [visurfacereader] Re: Please pass this around, Logic Pro X 
>> accessibility overview draft 5.1
>>  
>> Tim, can you describe the work-around in brief? I don’t need details or 
>> hand-holding, but not sure what tweak is needed.
>>  
>> I’ve given up on Mackie Control compatible gear like the ProjectMix and 
>> BCF2000, and now have a real Mackie Control Universal Pro. Also dumping my 
>> BCR2000 for a Mackie C4. Of the other low-cost surfaces, only the 
>> ProjectMix, and perhaps the FW1884, are close to the MCU’s construction 
>> quality. Of course, the ProjectMix and FW1884 are old products with horrible 
>> Mac support now, so not good options, anyway.
>>  
>> For others on the list that might be curious about the differences, the MCU 
>> has more dedicated buttons for functions than any of the other units that I 
>> listed. The MCU Pro is also significantly more compact than they are. 
>> Finally, the jog wheel on the MCU Pro is beefier, has a bit of weighted 
>> inertia to it, and has an all-around better feel to it than the ones that 
>> I’ve used on the ProjectMix and FW1884. The other Mackie Control compatible 
>> units always seem to cut some corner or another, even if a small one, and it 
>> is nice to finally have the real deal.
>> 
>> Bryan
>>  
>>  
>>  
>> On Aug 19, 2014, at 5:21 PM, Tim Burgess <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi,
>> 
>> There's currently a problem when trying to use SurfaceReader with Logic. The
>> Logic development team have a copy of the application and I'm waiting to
>> hear some suggestions. There is a way around, but it's dependent on you
>> having sighted help to set it up, so this is obviously unsatisfactory.
>> 
>> I'll post back on this as soon as I have something more constructive to add.
>> 
>> Best wishes.
>> Tim Burgess
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> [mailto:visurfacereader-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of ramy moustafa
>> Sent: 19 August 2014 19:00
>> To: visurfacereader@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Subject: [visurfacereader] Re: Please pass this around, Logic Pro X
>> accessibility overview draft 5.1
>> 
>> What version i must use from logic?
>> 
>> Ramy moustafa saber
>> Musicc instructor at:
>> faculty of musical education
>> music arranger and sound engineer
>> Sent from my iPhone
>> 
>> 
>> On May 22, 2014, at 6:06 PM, Keith Reedy <keithreedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi folks,
>> 
>> This is now on line at,
>> 
>> http://icanworkthisthing.com/docs/mac_with_voiceover/audio/Logic%20With%20Vo
>> iceover/LogicProXAccessibilityOverviewdraft5_1.shtml
>> 
>> 
>> Just a change in drag and drop loops.
>> 
>> This is as far as I will take the overview.  I think if one reads the
>> users guide they will get along fine.
>> 
>> We print the Bible in Braille,
>> http://biblesfortheblind.org
>> Keith Reedy
>> God gives His best to those who leave the choice with Him.  J Hudson
>> Taylor.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> We are Braille Bible printers,
>> http://biblesfortheblind.org
>> Keith Reedy
>> keithreedy@xxxxxxxxxxxx
>> 
>

Other related posts:

  1. Home
  2. visurfacereader
  3. Archive
  4. 08-2014