[trh] Re: Can we talk? Ok...how about RvR night?
- From: "Stormdancer" <stormdancer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <trh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 14 May 2002 16:35:04 -0500
Ok I will not try to make this lengthy. I agree with what everyone else
said on the replys.
I like all of them.
My additional suggestion is that we try to balance groups more. I know Bob
and myself got stuck with a lot of low members in our groups so it makes it
hard to rvr. At one point every single member of my group got wiped due
to aggro and there was nothing I could do about it. It frustrates me as a
healer to see that happen.
I know its not always going to be possible to do this but its worth a shot.
I couldnt keep up with the healing last night because of having mostly low
members so members of my group were dying constantly.
So consequently eventhough the raid was great for the alliance for me it
wasnt much fun.
This is not a complaint but an observation. And just wanted to point out
that maybe we could do better in this area also.
Laeasu
Carol
----- Original Message -----
From: "Nicole Erickson" <nerickson@xxxxxxxxxxx>
To: <trh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 12:35 PM
Subject: [trh] Re: Can we talk? Ok...how about RvR night?
>
> Have a quick break to add something real fast ... I will comment on
> others like I said later. Not sure if this has been mentioned ...
>
> Now that we have most of the guilds in the alliance that usually raid
> with us, with exception of Midgard's Might, I suggest we use /asend for
> all communication within the alliance for the raid. The Raid Leader,
> group leader(s)/organizer(s), other hopeful allies, and possibly all
> officers/GMs present should be included in the chatgroup. No others.
> This will help us trememdously, imho. There is just WAY too much going
> on for all of us to read all chats. Plus if there are group leaders and
> all officers/GMs in the chatgroup, it will help the group leader pass on
> info to the groups. More than likely there will be BOTH officers/GMs
> and group leaders, naturally, in most groups, if you know what I mean...
> Hope I made sense. K, enough. Gotta run. I will add more later.
>
> Maktiga
> Nicole
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: trh-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:trh-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On
> Behalf Of Olden
> Sent: Tuesday, May 14, 2002 11:58 AM
> To: trh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [trh] Re: Can we talk? Ok...how about RvR night?
>
>
>
> Woot!!!! Two replies....there really is somebody out there....;=)
>
> Ok, I suggested 3 people because I can't work that fast. This weekend I
> was in BG and somehow became the chat group leader, and at the same time
> was trying to form a group. It seemed like a dozen people arrived at the
> same time and I was swamped. I tried to /cg invite the same person 5
> TIMES because I kept spelling his name wrong. But I will trust you guys
> when you say that one person can handle BOTH functions with practically
> no delay.....I just know I can't so don't ever give both jobs to me.
> *grin*
>
> I LOVE the idea of taking a keep and working from there as a base for
> RvR. You're a genius.
>
> No, not sure that anyone has ever timed the ride from Hug, and the run
> without speed from Hag, and the run from Hag with speed. LOL, there are
> infinite possibilities. However, there is one other VERY good reason to
> bind in Hug...you can take that much needed AFK while on horse that you
> can't when trying to dodge trees running. I agree that we should have a
> bind spot suggestion for all events, not just those that take us to the
> frontier.
>
> Ok, here is my summary of what I "think" I have heard so far:
>
> 1. Everyone REALLY, REALLY needs to camp the night before the event at
> the start point for the event. And everyone REALLY, REALLY needs to be
> there prior to start time so we can actually leave at the designated
> start time. 2. The event posting should include a suggested bind spot.
> 3. There will be one person that handles all chat group invites AND
> assigns people to groups. This should not be the event leader, and also
> assumes that the group leaders are present early so they can issue the
> invites. 4.When it makes sense, we will have a "kick-off" event that
> gets those that are on time right into the action as soon as possible.
> Those that come later will be brought into the main group as soon as
> possible, but should not require a long pause in the action to do this.
> 5. When the event is aimed at RvR, a good plan would be taking a keep,
> and then using it as a base of operations for regular RvR, preferably in
> Hibernia.
>
> Let me know if this is correct or if I left something out, and then
> let's not stop here. What else can we do to improve the whole experience
> for everyone?
>
> Olden
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
