[THIN] Re: Visual Studio .NET

  • From: "Braebaum, Neil" <Neil.Braebaum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2005 17:54:19 +0100

Bandwidth.

Depending on your development environment, you may not be able to afford
the bandwidth require to site X number of developers Y number of miles
away from your datacenter / main infrastructure. However, you may well
be able to afford the fraction in bandwidth required that a thin client
will require, compared with a fat client.

Say if they are in another country, or quite a distance away from your
infrastructure.

As to the server stability, well virtualisation and application
management software should mean your OS is not compromised.

And as to the kind of server, well clearly you wouldn't mix this sort of
load / activity, with servers supporting normal desktop apps.

The devil drives when needs must...

Sometimes you don't have a choice, and there is only one other solution,
weighed up against astronomical costs.

Neil 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Jeff Pitsch
> Sent: 13 July 2005 17:43
> To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: [THIN] Re: Visual Studio .NET
> 
> I'm genuinely curious.  Why would you use TS/MF to deploy 
> Visual Studio?  It boggles my imagination what those 
> developers could be doing to the server.  Call me old school, 
> but I would rather developers mess with their own machines 
> than mess with one of mine in that way.  Seriously, one dumb 
> developer or one badly compiled program and everyone on the 
> server is now not working.  Just doesn't seem very prudent.
> 
> Jeff Pitsch
> 
> 
> On 7/13/05, Henry Sieff <hsieff@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > If I needed to support more developers, or deploy the app on 
> > general-use servers, I probably would opt for the softricity route.
> > 
> > Has anyone used Softricity to deploy vs.net?
> > 
> > --
> > Henry Sieff
> > Network Engineer
> > ph.  504-620-3420
> > mob. 504-931-4638
> > 
> > 
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Braebaum, Neil
> > > Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 10:53 AM
> > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > Subject: [THIN] Re: Visual Studio .NET
> > >
> > > For something like this virtualising or isolating the 
> apps is almost 
> > > certainly a requirement (see: Softgrid or app isolation 
> environments 
> > > in PS4), and performance optimisation software (tscale, armtech, 
> > > appsense).
> > >
> > > Neil
> > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Henry Sieff
> > > > Sent: 13 July 2005 16:09
> > > > To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: [THIN] Re: Visual Studio .NET
> > > >
> > > > I run a server with this for a development team of 
> about 16, but 
> > > > rarely do we see more than 4-6 users at a time. I saw 
> performance 
> > > > degradation when I had 10 users compile a large app at the
> > > same time,
> > > > but its been pretty stable and that useage pattern isn't
> > > normal, so I
> > > > would feel pretty confident putting 20 or so users on 
> there doing 
> > > > normal development, anything more and things may get 
> interesting 
> > > > because the IDE is very inefficient for running apps.
> > > >
> > > > I would strongly recommend, if you plan on pushing it to 20
> > > users and
> > > > beyond, that you use a CPU and/or memory optimization 
> package like 
> > > > tscale or armtech because your developers will starve each
> > > other and
> > > > the OS.
> > > >
> > > > http://msdn.microsoft.com/academic/techdown/techprod/netframew
> > > > ork/devsys
> > > > /devsysws03/default.aspx is a link to a bunch of stuff 
> about doing 
> > > > just this.
> > > >
> > > > Permissions can be hard - for some tasks (debugging 
> asp.net apps 
> > > > in
> > > > IIS5) they need to be local admins (whidbey is supposed to fix 
> > > > this problem). I simply use a runas and set up a local admin
> > > which they run
> > > > the app as once they log in if they need to do this. When I 
> > > > migrate this to Win2k3, I can use II6 which allows me 
> to give each
> > > developer
> > > > their own app pool which runs as them, and then they 
> can debug to 
> > > > their hearts content.
> > > >
> > > > Sysinternals is crucial since when they aren't running as
> > > local admin
> > > > they still need extra perms to HKCR, et al.
> > > >
> > > > Oh, and take images a lot, since at some point a third
> > > party control
> > > > will get installed that will fuxor everything.
> > > >
> > > > SourceSafe (I assume that's what you mean) was very 
> easy and runs 
> > > > great.
> > > > VS.NET is tougher, but as long as you are willing to spend
> > > some time
> > > > tweaking registry permissions and take steps to control
> > > changes (third
> > > > party control installation etc.) it can be pretty stable.


*****************************************************************************
This e-mail and its attachments are confidential and are intended for the above 
named recipient only. If this has come to you in error, please notify the 
sender immediately and delete this e-mail from your system. You must take no 
action based on this, nor must you copy or disclose it or any part of its 
contents to any person or organisation. Statements and opinions contained in 
this email may not necessarily represent those of Littlewoods Group Limited or 
its subsidiaries. Please note that e-mail communications may be monitored. The 
Registered Office of Littlewoods Group Limited and its subsidiaries is 100 Old 
Hall Street, Liverpool, L70 1AB. Registered number of Littlewoods Group Limited 
is 5059352.
*****************************************************************************




This message has been scanned for viruses by BlackSpider MailControl - 
www.blackspider.com
********************************************************
This Weeks Sponsor: Lakeside Software
SysTrack is the easiest to use, most complete way to monitor system and
application performance. SysTrack combines comprehensive monitoring 
capabilities with hardware/software inventory, change management, user/web
auditing, and reporting to create a total management solution.
Evaluation at: http://www.LakesideSoftware.com
**********************************************************
Now available BriForum-The Video!
http://www.brianmadden.com/store/pc/viewPrd.asp?idproduct=1&idaffiliate=3
Useful Thin Client Computing Links are available at:
http://thin.net/links.cfm
ThinWiki community - Excellent SBC Search Capabilities!
http://www.thinwiki.com
***********************************************************
For Archives, to Unsubscribe, Subscribe or
set Digest or Vacation mode use the below link:
http://thin.net/citrixlist.cfm

Other related posts: