I agree wholeheartedly with Tim. What he says doesn't just apply for app. virtualization or SBC but to a whole line of IT products: "Most customers that have a specific need will choose the best solution. *blank* always will do *blank* better than *blank*, *blank* will always do remote users better than *blank*" Regards, Michel Roth www.thincomputing.net On 3/9/06, Jim Kerr <jim@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Well done Tim. There will be demand for all of these products. Nobody > has the answer for everything. It's like asking which is better. SMS, > Altiris, Landesk etc... They all have their place and determining which one > is the best depends on many many factors. What size is the organization, > what are you trying to accomplish? blah blah blah... The same goes for > Virtual PC and VMware. Their are reasons to pick one over the other. I > have customers that use both and swear by both. > > Now for a serious question. Which is better, a PC or a MAC? :) > > Jim > > ----- Original Message ----- > *From:* Tim Mangan <tmangan@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > *To:* thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > *Sent:* Wednesday, March 08, 2006 6:54 PM > *Subject:* [THIN] Re: Softricity > > I tried, but I can't stay out of this subject. Predictions: > > > > 1) Longhorn will not make citrix irrelevant. > > 2) There will be customers that choose native terminal services over > citrix because longhorn is "good enough" considering $$ > > 3) Citrix will not make Softricity irrelevant. > > 4) There will be customers that choose AIE and whatever citrix renames > "Tarpon" into over softricity, because it is "good enough". > > 5) Most customers that have a specific need will choose the best > solution. Softricity always will do app virtualization better than citrix, > citrix will always do remote users better than microsoft. > > 6) Best of all, you don't really have to choose. You can still run > softgrid using citrix on microsoft terminal servers. Even if they publicly > feud. > > > > tim > > > > >