[THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: "Joe Shonk" <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:27:29 -0700
Which version of Netscaler did you use? V8.0 has the ICA Proxy built in and
works great provided you are running on the latest build.
Joe
_____
From: thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Chad Schneider (IT)
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 7:10 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
Lovely...was not aware of this, just purchased a new CAG for implementation.
The problem I had with the Netscalers, was they were nearly impossible to
configure as a CAG, SO much more difficult than the true CAG appliance.
>>> On 1/29/2008 at 8:01 AM, <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes , they are the best at this and can take over the CAG role as welll....
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message-----
From: "Chad Schneider (IT)" <Chad.M.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:58:37
To:<thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
I was afraid that would be the answer.
Can this be done with the Netscaler boxes? Do they have a built in load
balancing for this type of scenario, for WI?
>>> On 1/29/2008 at 7:53 AM, <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
External load balancer....
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message-----
From: "Chad Schneider (IT)" <Chad.M.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:43:25
To:<thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [THIN] HA for CAG to WI
We are using a CAG. Most of our users will go directly to a WI site, with a
couple applications, one of which auto-launches.
My question, is high availability. I know I can turn on failover for the VPN
client connections, but what are my options for HA for those connecting
directly to a WI.
Chad Schneider
Systems Engineer
ThedaCare IT
920-735-7615bI+hR{.n+&ޢ8zhVjبjzzZ0)i0zX+b)bI+hR{.n+&ޢ8zhVjبjzzZ0)i0zX+b)
Other related posts:
