[THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: "Chad Schneider (IT)" <Chad.M.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:11:10 -0600
How do they load balance the CAG to WI traffic?
How are they different than the CAG in this regard. If one is down, how does
it know to just shift the CAG traffic to the other for WI.
>>> On 1/29/2008 at 8:03 AM, <joe.shonk@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The Netscalers are awesome load balancers.. If the customer has the money they
could collapse the CAG functionality into the netscalers themselves.
Joe
From:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:thin-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Chad Schneider (IT)
Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2008 6:43 AM
To: thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [THIN] HA for CAG to WI
We are using a CAG. Most of our users will go directly to a WI site, with a
couple applications, one of which auto-launches.
My question, is high availability. I know I can turn on failover for the VPN
client connections, but what are my options for HA for those connecting
directly to a WI.
ChadSchneider
Systems Engineer
ThedaCare IT
920-735-7615
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: Joe Shonk
- References:
- [THIN] HA for CAG to WI
- From: Chad Schneider (IT)
- [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: Joe Shonk
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: Joe Shonk
- [THIN] HA for CAG to WI
- From: Chad Schneider (IT)
- [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: Joe Shonk