[THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: "Chad Schneider (IT)" <Chad.M.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:58:37 -0600
I was afraid that would be the answer.
Can this be done with the Netscaler boxes? Do they have a built in
load balancing for this type of scenario, for WI?
>>> On 1/29/2008 at 7:53 AM, <steveg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
External load balancer....
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
-----Original Message-----
From: "Chad Schneider (IT)" <Chad.M.Schneider@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 07:43:25
To:<thin@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: [THIN] HA for CAG to WI
We are using a CAG. Most of our users will go directly to a WI site,
with a couple applications, one of which auto-launches.
My question, is high availability. I know I can turn on failover for
the VPN client connections, but what are my options for HA for those
connecting directly to a WI.
Chad Schneider
Systems Engineer
ThedaCare IT
920-735-7615bI+hR{.n+&ޢ8zhVjبjzzZ0)i0zX+b)
- Follow-Ups:
- [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: Steve Greenberg
- References:
- [THIN] HA for CAG to WI
- From: Chad Schneider (IT)
- [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: Steve Greenberg
Other related posts:
- » [THIN] HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- » [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: Steve Greenberg
- [THIN] HA for CAG to WI
- From: Chad Schneider (IT)
- [THIN] Re: HA for CAG to WI
- From: Steve Greenberg