[TCUG] Re: Red lamp monitoring

  • From: mervyn.hallworth@xxxxxxxxxxxx
  • To: tcug@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2003 17:35:50 +0100

Just going back to the intergreen extension on a single lamp failure, I
agree with Dick that there is no logic to it. That was why a number of us
pressed to get the spec changed some years back - so that it now says:  "..
shall be possible if called for in the Works Specification" and:  ".. may
be extended up to a value of 5 seconds...".  So it is clearly an optional
facility, so as it causes everyone so much bother, why not simply opt not
to do it (like Leeds and no doubt others do) ?

Mervyn
Leeds Supertram



________________________________________________________________________

The information in this email (and any attachment) may be for the
intended recipient only. If you know you are not the intended recipient,
please do not use or disclose the information in any way and please
delete this email (and any attachment) from your system.
________________________________________________________________________

-----------------------------------------------------------
A message from the TCUG mailing list. For information about
the list visit //www.freelists.org/webpage/tcug

Other related posts: