[swag] Re: Summary of Submission Guidelines
- From: Daniel Falconer <falconernz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: swag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 10:21:16 +1200 (NZST)
--- Bob Rodgers <bobjrodgers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >
> ...
> Oh and Rev...you mentioned the Submissions
> Inquisitors
> being the ones to inform artist's that their work
> has been rejected- if you want I can take care of
> that
> duty, simply because it will relieve you guys of the
> unpleasentness and also I would rather an artist
> have
> a beef with me than with the three of you or anyone
> else in SWAG...Ive got a pretty tough skin. Anyway,
> thats just my offer to be a vessel of your decisions
> and critiques.
>
Thanks for the generous offer Bob,
but I kinda figured that was part of our job as
Inquisitors, so I'm happy to retain that aspect of it.
Actually, I look upon it as an opportunity to provide
some helpful critical feedback and advice, so it isn't
really a chore in my book. I doubt there will be any
unpleasantness providing we maintain a professional
and polite manner, and remember to encourage at every
opportunity.
Thanks all the same though. Besides which, I think
you're going to be a pretty busy man yourself. I'm
sure the three of us can handle it.
How do the other Inquisitors feel about this? Ronen,
Ghost?
regards, Daniel Falconer (Reverend Strone).
> Bob
>
> --- Chris Zaragoza <czaragoz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Well I have to say I more agree with the high
> > quality less requirements aim
> > than the "we take any old crap you want to
> scribble
> > down as long as it's
> > original and not pornographic" bit....
> >
> > Just seems that if I was looking for artwork for
> my
> > game and I found a site
> > making claims to be the end all answer to this
> need
> > and it was 75% crap I'd
> > look elsewhere from then on.
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Daniel Falconer" <falconernz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > To: <swag@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Sent: Sunday, June 02, 2002 4:05 PM
> > Subject: [swag] Re: Summary of Submission
> Guidelines
> >
> >
> > > Well,
> > >
> > > I'm of the opinion that we want to keep this
> site
> > as
> > > high quality as possible, both for Guild members
> > and
> > > casual submitters. The difference I see between
> > these
> > > two categories is that casual submitters aren't
> > bound
> > > to any regular committments or the Online
> Journal
> > > reqs. The higher the standard of work on our
> > pages,
> > > the more likely we'll be to attract better and
> > better
> > > artists. I don't so much see it as being
> > exclusive,
> > > as just aiming high. We can always lower our
> > > acceptance standards if we feel down the road
> that
> > > we're being too stingy, although I think
> > consistancy
> > > from the outset is always preferable.
> > >
> > > However, I do see the validity of the arguements
> > being
> > > expressed for the opposite policy, relaxing the
> > expert
> > > reqs for casual submitters, and I am happy to
> > yield to
> > > that, as it seems to be the popular view. As an
> > > Inquisitor, my position has to represent the
> > > philosophies and standards of the whole team at
> > SWAG,
> > > so I'm completely cool to go with the majority
> on
> > this
> > > one.
> > >
> > > Daniel Falconer (Reverend Strone).
> > >
> > > http://www.sold.com.au - The Sold.com.au Big
> Brand
> > Sale
> > > - New PCs, notebooks, digital cameras, phones
> and
> > more ... Sale ends June
> > 12
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
> http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
>
http://www.sold.com.au - The Sold.com.au Big Brand Sale
- New PCs, notebooks, digital cameras, phones and more ... Sale ends June 12
Other related posts:
