[SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- From: "Matthias Bergmann" <matthias-bergmann@xxxxxx>
- To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 22:13:32 +0100
Hello, I don`t understand why impedance should be limited to Frequency
domain. What impedance are we speaking about ? For example the
characteristicimpedance Z of a transmission line also exists in time domain.
If you look along a transmission line, v(t) / i(t) have got singularities
(undefined, infinite), these are called short and open ?!?!? Furthermore
mostof the simulation programs use the time domain because it permits
non-linearities. I don`t know how what happens when your impulse is
trapezoidal, but if it was a rectangular and your load is a capacitance, you
are answer would look like an exponential function, with your reflection
co-efficient as initial value. Regards, Matthias Bergmann P.S.: Yes, use
SPICE or ADS ! _m |---------+---------------------------------->
|        |     
         "Andrew
Ingraham" | |        
|             
 <a.ingraham@xxxxxxx| |        
|             
 g>            
    | |        
|             
 Gesendet von:      |
|        |     
         si-list-bounce@free|
|       |     
         lists.org  
      |
|       |     
             
             
  | |        
|             
             
       |
|       |     
         26.01.2005
15:53 | |        
|             
 Bitte antworten an | |        
|             
 a.ingraham         |
|        |     
             
             
  | |---------+---------------------------------->
 >---------------------------------------------------------------------
--  -----------------------------------------|
|             
             
          | | 
An:  <si
-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>          
-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time
domain           
60I            
          |
 >---------------------------------------------------------------------
--  -----------------------------------------| >I could be wrong >but
tome >impedance is a concept strongly related to Frequency domain. >>It is
meaningful just in that domain. Absolutely. If you define impedance as
voltage/current, then you run into great difficulties if you try to do it in
the time domain.  In general, with any complex impedance, v(t)/i(t) has
singularities (undefined, infinite). I consider impedance = v(s)/i(s) or
v(f)/i(f), which makes it a strictly frequency domain parameter. Regards,
Andy ------------------------------------------------------------------ To
unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe'
inthe Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List FAQ wiki
page is located at:
             
  http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ List technical
documents are available at:
            
 http://www.si-list.org List archives are viewable at:
             
           http://www.
freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives:
            
          http://groups.yah
oo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are
viewable at:
             
           http://www.
qsl.net/wb6tpu
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- From: steve weir
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- From: steve weir