[SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- From: "Andrew Ingraham" <a.ingraham@xxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2005 09:53:36 -0500
> I could be wrong
> but to me
> impedance is a concept strongly related to Frequency domain.
>
> It is meaningful just in that domain.
Absolutely.
If you define impedance as voltage/current, then you run into great
difficulties if you try to do it in the time domain. In general, with any
complex impedance, v(t)/i(t) has singularities (undefined, infinite).
I consider impedance = v(s)/i(s) or v(f)/i(f), which makes it a strictly
frequency domain parameter.
Regards,
Andy
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- References:
- [SI-LIST] capacitor impedance in time domain
- From: group_delay
- [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- From: Giancarlo Guida
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- » [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- [SI-LIST] capacitor impedance in time domain
- From: group_delay
- [SI-LIST] Re: capacitor impedance in time domain
- From: Giancarlo Guida