[SI-LIST] Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: "arsenault, brian" <arsenault_brian@xxxxxxx>
- To: "'si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx'" <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 11:01:32 -0400
Folks...
I'm looking for some suggestions and ideas on how to perform SI measurements
and correlate them to simulations when you don't have access to the receiver
pin.
For example, one of our designs is looking at back-to-back mounting of DDR-2
memory chips, and based on the spacing of the board, the vias close to the
receivers (the RAM's, when a read operation takes place) will not be
accessible. The same thing would apply to probing signals at a receiver
that is using blind and buried vias.
Traditionally, all of our technology has utilized only through-vias, and we
have been able to probe directly on the pins of the receivers if a via was
not located very close by. As we're moving forward, it's apparent that we
need to find a better way to both show the designer that his/her design will
work, and for the SI group to correlate their simulations to measurements.
I'm aware that building a test card to validate the buffers is one way to
go, but in these times, we are trying to minimize extra costs.
Thanks...
Brian
Brian Arsenault
Principal HW Engineer
EMC Corporation
Hopkinton, MA
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
http://www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
- Follow-Ups:
- [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: john
- [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: Douglas Burns
- [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: lgreen
- [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: Gary Otonari
- [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: Alan Hilton-Nickel
Other related posts:
- » [SI-LIST] Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- » [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: john
- [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: Douglas Burns
- [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: lgreen
- [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: Gary Otonari
- [SI-LIST] Re: Question on SI measurement/validation without receiver access
- From: Alan Hilton-Nickel