The devil is in the details. In my simplisitic view of power distribution problems, I always seperate the cases between core and I/O power distribution noise. In the former, switching activities inside the die creats the load and the power supply has to somehow provide a low impedance path to provide the power to the internal load. This is what I refer to as classical decoupling, power planes analysis etc. If you buy into my Japanese garden water bucket analogy, the transfer between package and PCB occurs somewhere around 100MHz. Like Larry said, the bucket gets faster and smaller towards the die and larger and slower towards the power supply. A corolllary of the analogy is if you improved the response of the upstream (power supply side) through Zycon or zillions of decoupling capacitors, you have to improved the corresponding respond downstream (package/die side) to get real benefit from it. If the package is aready at the limit in terms of pins, planes or decoupling capacitane at 100MHz or below, there is no additional benefit you can get from the Zycon plane in PCB above 100MHz. Yet another corollary of the analogy is if you already have a distribution problem on die and package, nothing you can do on the PCB side can eliminate the problem. In neither case Zycon can't help. In the later, it is an asymmetrical current loop between the I/O power (or ground) and the signal traces. It starts from the driving end, propagate through the signal traces to either the terminator or the receiving end and return through the power/gnd distribution to the driving end. I am not sure if resonance is the proper term to use. Maybe noise with a strong component at certain frequency is a better term. Given a fixed driver edge rate, the di/dt on the package will results in certain power/ ground bounce pattern (amplitude and duration). Such bouncing pattern will propagate out through the signal (not the power/gnd) as ringing. I think decoupling is the wrong concept or term to use here. You can't "decouple" a signal trace to power/ground other than its natural transmission line characteristic define by the impedance control stackup. Low impedance path for return current is a better analogy. Managing the return current flow is more important than any decoupling strategy you can create. Some mentioned using the decoupling plane next to the power plane that sandwich the signal trace as image current return. I think the current flowing on both side of that power plane has significant isolation between they (even though the are flowing in the same plane but on different sides). It is still not as low impedance as the plane capacitance between the power/ground planes sandwiching the signals. If you have to throw in the extra plane and extra cost to have those < 2mil planes. You mind as well make sure the referencing plane is the I/O power plane. It will save you the cost of the extra plane pairs and it will also be the lowest imedance path for the return current. -----Original Message----- From: Todd Westerhoff [mailto:twester@xxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 6:50 AM To: chris.cheng@xxxxxxxxxxxx; si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: RE: [SI-LIST] Re: Buried Capacitance thread comments (The whole t hing) Can I paraphrase? Mike - are you saying if there's a power distribution problem on the ASIC, proper board decoupling will at least prevent resonances from affecting the supply voltages to other parts at the PCB level? Chris - are you saying you agree, but if the driving device has a package-level power problem, the design is already in trouble, regardless of whether the resonance affects other devices or not? Todd. Todd Westerhoff SI Engineer - Hammerhead Networks 5 Federal Street - Billerica, MA - 01821 email:twester@xxxxxxxxxxx - ph: 978-671-5084 ============================================ "Oh, but ain't that America, for you and me Ain't that America, we're something to see Ain't that America, Home of the Free Little pink houses, for you and me" - John Mellencamp ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from si-list: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field or to administer your membership from a web page, go to: //www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list For help: si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field List archives are viewable at: //www.freelists.org/archives/si-list or at our remote archives: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at: http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu