[SI-LIST] Re: 4-port node numbering
- From: "Ray Anderson" <ray.anderson@xxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 13 Dec 2005 15:58:53 -0800
Thanks to all who responded to my earlier question on 4-port node
numbering.
After going over the many on list and off list responses it appears that
the opinion is split about 50-50 on which of the two numbering schemes
makes sense and should be used. There are persuasive arguments given for
each case.
So it looks like there currently is not any global standard to follow
and that one must decide which makes sense from their own perspective
and then at least standardize the node definitions within ones own
company.
Regards to all,
-Ray
Raymond Anderson
Senior Signal Integrity Staff Engineer
Product Technology Department
Advanced Package R&D
Xilinx Inc.
________________________________
From: Ray Anderson
Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 11:49 AM
To: si-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Cc: Ray Anderson
Subject: 4-port node numbering
I have general question regarding 4-port s-parameter files. Does anyone
know if there is a generally accepted industry standard for node
numbering?
...
....
....
------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from si-list:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the Subject field
or to administer your membership from a web page, go to:
//www.freelists.org/webpage/si-list
For help:
si-list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'help' in the Subject field
List FAQ wiki page is located at:
http://si-list.org/wiki/wiki.pl?Si-List_FAQ
List technical documents are available at:
http://www.si-list.org
List archives are viewable at:
//www.freelists.org/archives/si-list
or at our remote archives:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/si-list/messages
Old (prior to June 6, 2001) list archives are viewable at:
http://www.qsl.net/wb6tpu
Other related posts:
