[sac-forum] Re: weather
- From: "Frank Martin" <fmartin@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 9 Nov 2007 08:19:51 -0700
Steve, I have been packed since Wednesday and ready to go. So I am going.
Will leave Friday around 14:00. If it is cloudy least I can have some good
conversation and maybe work on some old images during the day. If I stay at
home all I will get to do is honey-do jobs.
Hope to see many of you there,
Frank Martin
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Steve Coe
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:47 PM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: weather
I have the Subaru packed up and ready to leave from work after lunch. I
will be there early and set up a scope unless it is hailing. That ought to
provide challenge enough to the weather guessers. It appears that we will
have at least a few other observers. If there is a chance to get a message
back to the city, we will do so.
I look forward to seeing Steve Dodder, Rosie and Matt, at least.
Hope to see you there;
Steve Coe
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Richard Harshaw
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 5:10 PM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: weather
I'm leaning towards a Saturday trip at this time, although the skies will
probably about 30% hazy.
DH
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Dan Gruber
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:41 PM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: weather
I'm planning to go on Saturday. The ability of meteorologists to
forecast the weather accurately even 24 hours in advance is refuted
regularly by reality. And it often seems to clear up in the wee hours,
particularly if most people have left!
It would be nice if anybody who's out there already could text a report
to the forum on Sat.
Clear skies,
Dan
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 4:10 PM
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: weather
OK,
I for one am going. I took a vacation day tomorrow and by God, I'm
going to
have a vacation!
Here is the NWS discussion:
MODELS ARE STILL FORECASTING THE LOW
PRESSURE SYSTEM...CURRENTLY 400 MILES WEST OF LOS ANGELES...TO MOVE
INTO ARIZONA IN SOME FASHION OR ANOTHER. THIS IS BECAUSE THE MODELS
ARE STILL VERY INCONSISTENT ON THE DEPTH...INTENSITY...AND EVEN
AMOUNT OF MOISTURE WITH THIS SYSTEM FOR SUNDAY. OUR INCLINATION IS
TO GO WITH THE EUROPEAN MODEL...WHICH FORECASTS BACK TO BACK
SYSTEMS...I.E... A TROF MOVING THROUGH AZ SATURDAY AFTERNOON
FOLLOWED BY A STRONGER SYSTEM SUNDAY NIGHT.
SO I will have a short vacation based on the "European Model."
If I get some observing in, so much the better.
Matt
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.26/1119 - Release Date:
11/8/2007
5:55 PM
- References:
- [sac-forum] Re: weather
- From: Steve Coe
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- [sac-forum] Re: weather
- From: Steve Coe