[sac-forum] Re: weather
- From: "Rick Tejera" <saguaroastro@xxxxxxx>
- To: <sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 8 Nov 2007 18:07:12 -0700
I too, will be there Saturday. I'll be bringing my Godson with me who's in
town from Melbourne, Fl Checking out Graduate programs at ASU. I'm working
on the premise that Partly Cloudy means Mostly Clear.
As has been sated, many a good night has been had by those willing to wait
it out. Looks like there'll be some good company to chat with while we wait,
so count me in.
Clear Skies
Rick Tejera
President, Editor SACnews
Saguaro Astronomy Club
Phoenix, Arizona
www.saguaroastro.org
saguaroastro@xxxxxxx
-----Original Message-----
From: sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:sac-forum-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Thursday, November 08, 2007 16:10
To: sac-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [sac-forum] Re: weather
OK,
I for one am going. I took a vacation day tomorrow and by God, I'm going to
have a vacation!
Here is the NWS discussion:
MODELS ARE STILL FORECASTING THE LOW
PRESSURE SYSTEM...CURRENTLY 400 MILES WEST OF LOS ANGELES...TO MOVE
INTO ARIZONA IN SOME FASHION OR ANOTHER. THIS IS BECAUSE THE MODELS
ARE STILL VERY INCONSISTENT ON THE DEPTH...INTENSITY...AND EVEN
AMOUNT OF MOISTURE WITH THIS SYSTEM FOR SUNDAY. OUR INCLINATION IS
TO GO WITH THE EUROPEAN MODEL...WHICH FORECASTS BACK TO BACK
SYSTEMS...I.E... A TROF MOVING THROUGH AZ SATURDAY AFTERNOON
FOLLOWED BY A STRONGER SYSTEM SUNDAY NIGHT.
SO I will have a short vacation based on the "European Model."
If I get some observing in, so much the better.
Matt
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.5.503 / Virus Database: 269.15.26/1119 - Release Date: 11/8/2007
5:55 PM
- Follow-Ups:
- [sac-forum] Re: weather
- From: Steve Coe
- [sac-forum] Re: weather
- From: Andrew Goodwin
- References:
- [sac-forum] Re: weather
- From: Matt
Other related posts:
- » [sac-forum] weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- » [sac-forum] Re: weather
- [sac-forum] Re: weather
- From: Steve Coe
- [sac-forum] Re: weather
- From: Andrew Goodwin
- [sac-forum] Re: weather
- From: Matt