[sac-board] Re: Newsletter
- From: Gene A Lucas <geneluca@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 28 Feb 2011 14:03:01 -0700
Here are my thoughts on these issues, as an emeritus, ex-officio SAC
Bored Person...
(1) and (2) are ok. I especially favor no. 2 !! What are we
restricting, and WHY? What do we gain from withholding the NL?
(3) is more complicated. Not only do we need a (SMALL) supply of copies
to give out to the public, we DO have members who don' t have
convenient internet access. They are entitled to receive the NL, but
probably should be charged a (as small as possible, to cover cost) extra
fee (mostly for postage).
Just my thoughts...
Gene Lucas
My OPINIONS are FREE and my OWN... Get SOME of YOUR own....
On 2/28/2011 12:05 PM, Richard Harshaw wrote:
> Board,
>
>
> I'd like your okay for a couple of ideas.
>
>
>
>
>
> (1) Make the newsletter available n/c to all science teachers in the
> State. (Walt Thomas is looking into whether or not there is such a email
> distribution list and whether or not the state education department would
> let us use it.)
>
>
>
> (2) I'd like to put the CURRENT version of the newsletter on the web page
> for viewing by the public the month it is released. That is, put March's NL
> on the web page this month, not in 3 or 6 months.
>
>
>
> (3) I'd like to discontinue all printed copies of the NL. With the March
> issue, I'd like to mail the few we do and include a cover letter stating
> that this is the last hard copy issue they will receive, and that if they
> want to continue to receive issues, they need to supply us with an email
> address.
>
>
>
>
>
> Can you please chime in on these points with your thoughts ASAP? I'd like
> permission to do this starting March.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Richard Harshaw
>
> Cave Creek, Arizona
>
> Brilliant Sky Observatory
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Other related posts:
