[sac-board] Re: Herschel II Proposal
- From: Jack Jones <telescoper@xxxxxxx>
- To: sac-board@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2008 00:00:33 -0700
There are a few, myself among them. I'm about halfway there after about
oh 8 yrs off and on, and don't know if it will be completed in my
lifetime (esp how the weather has been going :-). The Herschel II are
faint really obscure objects mostly and anyone trying them good luck and
happy observing! I think rather than add a Saguaro Herschel II list, why
don't we just join AL? They have added many new lists in the past few years.
It may be better and simpler to just ignore the H II as we do the Beyond
The NGC list (H II and any other lists that come along, like Arp,
Hickson, etc etc) and cut off the 1000 list with the Herschel 400 as we
have it now. What I mean is keep it like it is, a classic, and 1000
Beyond means 1000 beyond the Herschel 400. What a pain for you to check
400 more objects to not be on the 1000 list, plus doesn't that make it
harder for anyone starting the 1000 list now? Of course, this is only
going to affect a few people.
Jack
AJ Crayon wrote:
>
> I'm not sure if any SAC members are working on the 1000 list.
>
> AJ Crayon
> Phoenix, AZ
>
Other related posts:
