[sac-board] Re: Herschel II Proposal

AJ I just caught up with the other responses to this and I am 
satisfied.  No response to my previous email is needed.
Rich




AJ Crayon wrote:
> There are several e-mails on this topic and I'd like to address the topics 
> and positions with this one message.
>
> In regards to joining the AL; no one seems to feel this is a good idea, nor 
> does there seem to be enough interest to investigate joining.  So we drop 
> this topic.
>
> As far as observing programs are concerned we should keep them the way they 
> are without any tinkering.  This means the H400, 1000 New and 110 Beyond the 
> NGC stay as they are.  We should also support anyone completing the HII list 
> with some sort of an award.
>
> The above sounds quite reasonable to me and I have no problems with taking 
> those positions.
>
> The question that remains open is what kind of award should we present to 
> anyone crazy enough :)) to complete the HII program.  As Deep Sky Chairman 
> I'm willing to accept and review the observations for correctness and 
> authenticity.  That's still lots of fun.  Yet what does the award consist 
> and should there be a budget?
>
> I'd also like to thank everyone for responding, you've been a great help.
>
> AJ Crayon
> Phoenix, AZ
>
>   


Other related posts: