I am sure you will get more suggestions than there are films. Neopan was a modern flat crystal film, so I think you best chance of getting a similar look is with either Ilford Delta 400, or TMax 400. Perhaps shoot a few rolls of each and see which you like. Contrast is a function of developing time, so you will want to adjust the development time to give the results you want. Richard On Tue, 19 Aug 2014 21:48:42 +0200 Jan Decher <jdecher@xxxxxxx> wrote: > Thanks Everyone for your suggestions. Well, its NOT my trusty > Rolleiflex 3.5E causing the pattern, I think, because I just got back > a Portra 160 today , which I loaded after the last spoiled Neopan > picture in Leiden, NL. The Portra looks perfect ! > > The airport x-ray suggestion sound plausible to me. This Neopan may > have been x-rayed at least once or twice during the move here to > Germany in 2012 and maybe also last fall during a flight to Italy. I > am no longer using the lead bags after someone told me the x-ray > people just crank up the dosage if they see a "big unpenetrable blob" > in the picture (??). So this, and the film being relatively old & > expired could be the problem. To narrow the problem I should probably > shoot a roll of brand new TriX and process with same chemicals i the > same Kindermann tank and see if things are okay. > > 'Hope to scan some of the Portra negs this week for you to see. > > Cheers, > Jan > Bonn > > P.S.: What's your thoughts on the best 400 ASA (120) film to replace > my beloved Neopan 400? Ilford HP5, TriX?? I don't like very > contrasty negs in my b&w shots. --- Rollei List - Post to rollei_list@xxxxxxxxxxxxx - Subscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'subscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Unsubscribe at rollei_list-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with 'unsubscribe' in the subject field OR by logging into www.freelists.org - Online, searchable archives are available at //www.freelists.org/archives/rollei_list