Democracy does not always assure the best solution to a problem. However, it does assure more ownership & involvement in decisions & as a result more desire to enthusiastically participate in the future. Isn't that what we'd like to see with kids, parents & staff in the Regional School? I also wonder whether or not this new top-down model will influence the direction of schools & classrooms to become even more un-democratic. Dan --- On Fri, 1/15/10, Brad Cherin <bcher14620@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: From: Brad Cherin <bcher14620@xxxxxxxxx> Subject: [regional_school] Re: Update To: regional_school@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Date: Friday, January 15, 2010, 8:15 AM Hi Bill, I am going through the process to discern the value of mayoral control. In what ways is an elected school board versus an elected mayor more or less a democracy? I could make the argument that in a crisis type situation leadership with one head is more effective than leadership with 7 heads. I would appreciate your thoughts. Brad Cherin --- On Thu, 1/14/10, William Cala <wcala9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: William Cala <wcala9@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [regional_school] Update > To: "regional" <regional_school@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > Date: Thursday, January 14, 2010, 8:07 PM > #yiv1543396136 p > {margin:0;}We are nearly > complete with the first phase of planning for the Regional > School. I have one last meeting with one of the > planning teams next week. After that I will be > planning a general meeting to discuss our progress. It > is my intent to have committee chairs update us on the fine > work that has been done by all Curriculum, Advisory, Social > Justice and Discipline committees. > > There are a number of areas that will now need to be > addressed: teacher selection, union representation, > governance, transportation and others. We will > aggressively tackle these areas this winter. > > On a related topic, I have been following the issue of > mayoral control with great attention and serious > concern. The Regional Academy is a school built on the > pillars of social justice, civil rights and participatory > democracy. Mayoral control is the antithisis of these > important principles. Over the past year I have > reached out to the mayor without response. This past > week I have sought advice from friends whose > opinions and guidance I respect. I have written a > substantial essay on this topic and I have been debating > whether or not to make it public. My major conceern is > that the legislation for the Regional School would be > stalled or killed as a result of speaking in opposition to > mayoral control (The same bill drafters of the Regional > Academy appear to be the principal parties who will draft > the bill for mayoral control). > > The speed at which the movement for mayoral control > appears to be heading toward Albany has created an urgency > to respond. After much soul-searching and careful > thought I do not feel that I can permit this assault on > democracy without putting up a fight. > > We are creating a school whose major role is to produce > good citizens who will forward not thwart democracy. > To remain silent is not an option for me. Silence is > democracy's most strident enemy. As a result, this > evening I have decided to fight. I have sent my essay > to City Newspaper. You can read it at: > http://www.rochestercitynewspaper.com/news/articles/2010/01/COMMENTARY-Mayoral-control-doesnt-work-and-is-wrong/ > > > I will also be on Bob Smith's 1370 Connection on > January 29th @ 1 p.m. and will be speaking before City > Council on Tuesday evening at 7 p.m. > > If you agree that the urban poor of the City of > Rochester should not be disenfranchised by losing the right > to vote for school board members (as it is city residents > cannot vote for their budget, a right suburban residents > enjoy) I ask that you speak out and let your voices be > heard. > > Another excellent analysis of the mayoral control crisis > in Rochester is at: http://www.smugtownbeacon.com/news.php?viewStory=430 > > Thanks for understanding. > > Bill