N+2 development raises the contrast, but in terms of local contrast it does so only within a narrower band of midgreys. The shadows and highlights may actually get their local contrast reduced by being blocked into pure black/white. So the idea of the green/yellow/red filters is to lighten the leaves, darken the sky and reduce the overall contrast of the scene (leaves vs sky) - which then allows you to boost the local contrast with increased development. Nicolas --- Shannon Stoney <shannonstoney@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I use the BTZS system which is a variant on the zone > system. I > actually saw this as an N-2 scene, according to my > records, with a > subject brightness range of 10.5. The reason was, I > metered the sky (EV > 14) and placed it in zone 7. The shadows metered at > 8. > > So, in retrospect I realized I should have not > worried about the sky at > all, but just let it blow out. After all it's not > an important part of > the image. > > --shannon > > > On Sep 22, 2007, at 3:40 PM, Bob Adler wrote: > > > Well, I agree and disagree. > > > > I agree the scans aren't perfect (whose are?). > What I disagree about > > is it looks like the negatives have very little > contrast, and no > > amount of playing with the scanning or PS > parameters is going to > > change that. > > > > The fact that the histogram is "all bunched up at > one end" seems to > > suggest that all your negative's data is bunched > up; i.e., no contrast > > in the negative. Probably because there was little > contrast in the > > scene (except between the vegetation of the scene > and the sky). > > > > You could of course boost the contrast in the > vegetative part of the > > scene by shooting and developing at +2 (doesn't > look like +1 would cut > > it here; I'm not even sure +2 could give you what > you previsualized). > > Zone system is great for stuff like this; lots of > fun and fun results. > > > > Bottom line; low contrast negative, low contrast > scan, low contrast > > everything... > > > > IMHO, > > Bob > > > > "Nicholas O. Lindan" <nolindan@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > >> "Shannon Stoney" > >> >I scanned the flat negatives and put them on my > flickr site: > >> > http://www.flickr.com/photos/shannonstoney/ > >> > I didn't do anything to them to "fix" them in > photoshop. These are > >> > just straight scans. > >> > >> To begin ... the scans are bad. You don't have > information > >> in the scan for the vegetation, it's all driven > out by setting > >> the white point to the sky. > >> > >> Scan only for the vegetation in the foreground. > Set the > >> white point to the lightest highlight in the veg. > and the > >> black for the blackest shadow (or to the > unexposed film). > >> > >> Let the sky and the far trees go where ever they > go, don't > >> try and keep them. > >> > >> Now go into PS and play with curves to get the > image you want. > >> This will give you an idea of what you will need > to do in the > >> darkroom. > >> > >> Do the same for the sky and trees: scan for and > adjust just for > >> this part of the image - this will give you and > idea of the burn > >> and required burn contrast for that part of the > image. > >> > >> > >> > >> Nicholas O. Lindan > >> Cleveland Engineering Design, LLC > >> Cleveland, Ohio 44121 > >> > >> > ====================================================================== > > >> ======================================= > >> To unsubscribe from this list, go to > www.freelists.org and logon to > >> your account (the same e-mail address and > password you set-up when > >> you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there. > > > > > > > > Bob Adler > > Palo Alto, CA > > http://www.raflexions.com Sick of deleting your inbox? Yahoo!7 Mail has free unlimited storage. http://au.docs.yahoo.com/mail/unlimitedstorage.html ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.