[pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- From: "Dana H. Myers" <dana.myers@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: pure-silver@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 17:33:00 -0700
Jim Brick wrote:
At 06:42 PM 9/22/2007 -0500, Shannon Stoney wrote:
So, in retrospect I realized I should have not worried about the sky
at all, but just let it blow out. After all it's not an important
part of the image.
--shannon
That is indeed what you should have done... then expose & develop as N+2
or 3 :-) I'm really careful about this kind of stuff because I don't
know how to fix things in PhotoSlop.
Even with PhotoShop, there's no magic bullet. You really want to get
the negative right; otherwise you end up with something difficult to
print or scan, even if you have a scanner that allows adjusting
pre-scan analog gain.
Dana
=============================================================================================================
To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your
account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,)
and unsubscribe from there.
- Follow-Ups:
- [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- From: Mark Blackwell
- References:
- [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- From: Bob Adler
- [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- From: Shannon Stoney
- [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- From: Jim Brick
Other related posts:
- » [pure-silver] fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- » [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
At 06:42 PM 9/22/2007 -0500, Shannon Stoney wrote:
So, in retrospect I realized I should have not worried about the sky at all, but just let it blow out. After all it's not an important part of the image.--shannon
That is indeed what you should have done... then expose & develop as N+2 or 3 :-) I'm really careful about this kind of stuff because I don't know how to fix things in PhotoSlop.
- [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- From: Mark Blackwell
- [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- From: Bob Adler
- [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- From: Shannon Stoney
- [pure-silver] Re: fence row project negatives
- From: Jim Brick