3.5 stops less than subject measurement (between Zone I and II) is 0.17 relative to fog. (Normal development gives exposure of +3.5 stops at 1.37 (between Zone VIII and IX) As per Ralph's and my book :) On 10/10/04 9:26 pm, "Ryuji Suzuki" <rs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: Christopher Woodhouse <chris.woodhouse@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > Subject: [pure-silver] TMAX grain - developer modification? > Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 08:48:24 +0100 > >> Now to the question: I seem to remember that Tmax grain does not >> alter with developing agent. Is that right? > > My experience is that grain of T-MAX films vary with developer > formulation just as much as other films, but sometimes in different > ways. (I have more experience with TMX than TMY.) > >> Maybe it is the cynic in me, but the rank order of grain is >> inversely proportional to the EI :) > > I agree that Neopan 400 is a bit slower than Tri-X. When Delta 400 > changed a few years ago, it also increased speed and graininess. My > guess is that Delta 400 as well as T-MAX 400 were criticized for poor > shadow quality and lack of underexposure latitude, making them less > suitable as student films. > > What's your criteria for EI? > -- > Ryuji Suzuki > "Keep a good head and always carry a light camera." > ============================================================================== > =============================== > To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your > account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) > and unsubscribe from there. > -- Regards Chris Woodhouse ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.