From: "Richard Knoppow" <dickburk@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: [pure-silver] Re: TMAX grain - developer modification? Date: Sun, 10 Oct 2004 11:53:32 -0700 > Evidently it doesn't suffer from grain clumping as much as some > other films, perhaps due to the very hard emulsion which does not > allow as much migration of the grains. Grain clumping is caused by > high pH developers which soften the emulsion. Which film suffers from grain clumping and grain migration, in any practical processing solutions? > but the company no longer has much idea of its history, as I > found out not lonjg ago when they seemed not to know when > D-76 originated. What do you consider the origin of D-76, and how did you determine Kodak didn't know about it? > I wonder if the Tri-X emulsion making process drifted over the > years and was brought back to optimum when the operation was > moved. One would have to have Tri-X negatives of forty or fifty > years ago developed in a common developer to tell. Based on common knowledge of emulsion making, there is no question that Tri-X changed in 50 years. Practice of emulsion making changed so much in 50 years. First of all, gelatin supply changed a lot, and photographic quality of emulsions depends strongly on the gelatin quality. There were a few key technologies and new knowledge in last 50 years that are highly valuable in economical production of negative emulsions. Then environmental regulations changed so much that several compounds used 50 years ago are not even a possibility today. -- Ryuji Suzuki "Keep a good head and always carry a light camera." ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.