"I just find the whole reaction here to be extreme. Just my opinion," And here in lies the problem. Photographic art was singled out as objectionable; with phrases like pornographic being thrown around. While the prints do elicit questions from the viewer as to what is going on there, none of the images are pornographic. Many have pointed out that none of the other images seemed to raise the ire of the director. Did you query the gallery individual to find out if action was already being put forth by the gallery director prior to the request? This would clearly show she found them out of place with the show. If she waited until being confronted by an unhappy viewer, what will be her answer when the paintings and sculpture are found to be offensive? Extreme actions require extreme measures. Protests and legal action are hardly extreme in this prudish culture. Hanging the director in effigy is extreme. Burning the flag in protest is extreme. Calling for common sense is far from extreme. Janet there was an invitation to show just these types of works at this venue. So while there may be many places to find nudity in America, the call was made to bring it on and so it was done by the artist and selected by the approved judges. "(Sometimes I think people just like a good fight.)" Janet I also see this as case where promises are made and then broken. Like so many other commitments made before them here in America. The gallery, the board, and the director have NO integrity. If she was out on bereavement leave, there should have been a qualified person there to over see what was going on. AS painful as her situation was and still may be, some one should have stepped up to the plate and taken charge and stood by their commitment to the artists, the gallery and their board. Eric Eric Neilsen Photography 4101 Commerce Street Suite 9 Dallas, TX 75226 http://e.neilsen.home.att.net http://ericneilsenphotography.com Skype ejprinter