If I have a film I liked, I might try out new films to see if I still preferred my standard. If you you then repackage the film I like and put ot up for sale... I will buy it thinking it is something new. (My opinion of the "NEW" film at that point is irrelavent; I may notice that they behave the same or I might miss it totally, that doesn't matter here.) What matters is the fact that you would have successfully tricked me into buying something I would not have bought, had I had access to the truth. In my way of looking at it, you would have lied, deceived and essentially stollen from me. OK, yes... As far as quality products go, My Favorite could be made by the guy formerly known as Prince on a pebble formerly known as Pluto for all I care. The specific "Who What Where" is not the issue... CONCIELING the "Who, What Where" is the issue. It is not what's under the wool I am angry about... it is the wool itself. I am in no need of not knowing who makes my film. Do you know people who actually NEED not to know? Ray --- "Dana H. Myers" <dana.myers@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Ray Rogers wrote: > > > I would just like to be able to know EXACTLY WHAT it is I am buying. > > Suppose you buy a film that is well-specified, with detailed > sensitometric graphs, development charts, etc. The product > works as advertised and you're happy with it. What does it > matter where it's made as long as it consistently performs > according to spec? The "what you're buying" *is* determined > by the specification. > > Dana ____________________________________________________________________________________ You rock. That's why Blockbuster's offering you one month of Blockbuster Total Access, No Cost. http://tc.deals.yahoo.com/tc/blockbuster/text5.com ============================================================================================================= To unsubscribe from this list, go to www.freelists.org and logon to your account (the same e-mail address and password you set-up when you subscribed,) and unsubscribe from there.