RE: two databases in a server
- From: "Jesse, Rich" <Rich.Jesse@xxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:37:50 -0600
"DASD"? Ouch. Think "SAN". More spindles, more bandwidth, less waste.
Rich
-----Original Message-----
From: oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:oracle-l-bounce@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Thomas Day
Sent: Friday, March 31, 2006 2:30 PM
To: Michael Fontana
Cc: oracle-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: two databases in a server
Well, in fact, I usually am that guy. I buy a an Intel box with
the largest RAM that it will support and the biggest hard drive that the
budget will allow.
When the box is maxed out (either on RAM or DASD) I just start
saying, "No" until someone says, "I have budget for a new server."
The production is business critical. There is no point to the
existence of this organization if the production database is not
functioning. This may be hard for the bean counters to understand but
their existence is pointless if the database is not working.
Other related posts:
