Re: two databases in a server
- From: Tom Fox <tom@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: David Sharples <davidsharples@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2006 12:53:01 -0500 (EST)
I've heard the argument before about having more than one instance on a
machine is a bad idea.
However, on the flip side, having 50 applications share one instance can
be bad, as if one app needs a particular patch, you're affecting 49 other
applications due to one application's requirements.
Anyone care to elaborate why more than one instance is bad?
--Tom
On Thu, 30 Mar 2006, David Sharples wrote:
> by joining them into a single instance - that is best practise
>
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- References:
- RE: two databases in a server
- From: Roger Xu
- Re: two databases in a server
- From: David Sharples
Other related posts:
- » two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » Re: two databases in a server
- » Re: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » Re: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » Re: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » Re: two databases in a server
- » Re: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » Re: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » Re: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » Re: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- » RE: two databases in a server
- RE: two databases in a server
- From: Roger Xu
- Re: two databases in a server
- From: David Sharples