RE: Sun T2000
- From: "Kevin Closson" <kevinc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- To: <afatkulin@xxxxxxxxx>, <duncan.lawie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 09:10:12 -0700
of the T2000 server
vs Proliant DL380 G3 (based on 3Ghz Xeons).
One Niagara core were approximately 7 to 8 times slower than single
Xeon CPU in batch task (huge sorts/aggregates) -
...I'm not syaing you didn't see this result, but that seem slower than
expected. To what degree was I/O a factor?
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin
- References:
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Lawie, Duncan
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin
Other related posts:
- » Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Lawie, Duncan
- Re: Sun T2000
- From: Alexander Fatkulin