Re: Sun T2000
- From: "Alexander Fatkulin" <afatkulin@xxxxxxxxx>
- To: duncan.lawie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2007 15:08:48 +1000
Duncan,
I've recently done a "quick and dirty" comparison of the T2000 server
vs Proliant DL380 G3 (based on 3Ghz Xeons).
One Niagara core were approximately 7 to 8 times slower than single
Xeon CPU in batch task (huge sorts/aggregates) - that is, you need a
parallel factor of eight on this "everywhere cool" server in order to
beat single threaded Xeon.
That being said - you still can use T2000 for batch jobs _if_ your can
parallelize them. Otherwise the performance of a single core is just
abysmal at best.
Are these servers up to the job of running a database? It sounds like they
might be OK for OLTP, but bad if there is significant batch work.
--
Alexander Fatkulin
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l
- Follow-Ups:
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Kevin Closson
- References:
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Lawie, Duncan
Other related posts:
- » Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » RE: Sun T2000
- » Re: Sun T2000
Are these servers up to the job of running a database? It sounds like they might be OK for OLTP, but bad if there is significant batch work.
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Kevin Closson
- RE: Sun T2000
- From: Lawie, Duncan